This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TO0495(01)
Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 September 2018.#Gratis iҫ ve Dis Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Applications for EU figurative marks gratis — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Joined Cases T-495/17 and T-496/17.
Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 September 2018.
Gratis iҫ ve Dis Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Applications for EU figurative marks gratis — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Joined Cases T-495/17 and T-496/17.
Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 September 2018.
Gratis iҫ ve Dis Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Applications for EU figurative marks gratis — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Joined Cases T-495/17 and T-496/17.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:554
- Date of document:
- 13/09/2018
- Date lodged:
- 28/07/2017
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Third countries
- Form:
- Order
- Authentic language:
- Dutch
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- EU institutions and bodies, European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Passer
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62017TB0495
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 32009R0207: N 1 34
- 32009R0207-A07P2: N 4 11 14
- 32009R0207-A07P1LB: N 4 11 14 15 38
- 32015Q0423(01)-A126: N 9 10
- 62003TJ0286-N20: N 21
- 62003TJ0286-N22: N 21
- 62005CJ0412-N65: N 34
- 62008CJ0398-N33: N 15
- 62010CJ0051-N74: N 35
- 62010CJ0051-N75: N 36
- 62010CJ0051-N76: N 36
- 62010CJ0344-N43: N 16
- 62010TJ0107-N24: N 20
- 62010TJ0204-N24: N 21
- 62010TJ0304-N58: N 20
- 62011CJ0311-N24: N 16
- 62012TJ0243-N43: N 34
- 62013CO0070-N45: N 37
- 62013TJ0559-N21: N 21
- 62013TJ0559-N22: N 21
- 62013TJ0559-N23: N 21
- 62013TJ0559-N24: N 21
- 62013TJ0559-N25: N 21
- 62013TJ0559-N26: N 21
- 62014TJ0059-N27: N 21
- 62014TJ0216-N20: N 17
- 62015TJ0062-N22: N 21
- 62015TJ0261-N23: N 21
- 62015TO0220-N12: N 10
- 62016TJ0479-N15: N 15
- 62016TJ0479-N20: N 17
- 62016TJ0479-N22: N 21
- 62016TO0021-N12: N 10
- 62016TO0719-N10: N 10
- 62017TO0234-N14: N 10
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
