EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TJ0187
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2018.#Bernard Krone Holding SE & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Mega Liner — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75, first sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-187/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2018.
Bernard Krone Holding SE & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Mega Liner — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75, first sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-187/17.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2018.
Bernard Krone Holding SE & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Mega Liner — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75, first sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-187/17.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:254