Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TJ0201

    Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2010.
    Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
    Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Seroslim - Earlier Community word mark SEROSTIM - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).
    Case T-201/08.

    European Court Reports 2010 II-00203*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:408

    Date of document:
    28/09/2010
    Date lodged:
    26/05/2008
    Author:
    General Court
    Country or organisation from which the request originates:
    Third countries
    Form:
    Judgment
    Authentic language:
    English
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment - unfounded
    Applicant:
    Individual
    Defendant:
    EU institutions and bodies, European Union Intellectual Property Office
    Judge-Rapporteur:
    Frimodt Nielsen
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:





    Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2010 – Market Watch v OHIM – Ares Trading (Seroslim)

    (Case T-201/08)

    Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community word mark Seroslim – Earlier Community word mark SEROSTIM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 23-24, 49)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 March 2008 (Case R 805/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Ares Trading SA and Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc.

    Information relating to the case

    Applicant for the Community trade mark:

    Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc.

    Community trade mark sought:

    Word mark Seroslim for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35 – Application No 4113321

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

    Ares Trading SA

    Mark or sign cited in opposition:

    Word mark SEROSTIM for goods in Class 5 (Community trade mark No 2405694)

    Decision of the Opposition Division:

    Opposition upheld in respect to all the goods in Class 5 and in respect of ‘soaps, hair lotions and dentifrices’ in Class 3

    Decision of the Board of Appeal:

    Appeal dismissed


    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. to pay the costs.

    Top