Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62007TJ0275

    Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 2 December 2008.
    Ebro Puleva, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
    Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark BRILLO’S - Earlier national figurative marks featuring the word element ‘brillante’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
    Case T-275/07.

    European Court Reports 2008 II-00300*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2008:545

    Date of document:
    02/12/2008
    Date lodged:
    19/07/2007
    Author:
    General Court
    Country or organisation from which the request originates:
    Spain
    Form:
    Judgment
    Authentic language:
    Spanish
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment - unfounded
    Applicant:
    Individual
    Defendant:
    EU institutions and bodies, European Union Intellectual Property Office
    Judge-Rapporteur:
    Pelikánová
    Treaty:
    Treaty establishing the European Economic Community
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:





    Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 2 December 2008 – Ebro Puleva v OHIM – Berenguel (BRILLO’S)

    (Case T-275/07)

    Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark BRILLO’S – Earlier national figurative marks featuring the word element ‘brillante’ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

    Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 24, 28)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2007 (Case R 493/2006-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Ebro Puleva, SA and Luis Berenguel, SL.

    Information relating to the case

    Applicant for the Community trade mark:

    Luis Berenguel, SL

    Community trade mark sought:

    Word mark BRILLO’S for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 31 – Application No 2984995

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

    Ebro Puleva, SA

    Mark or sign cited in opposition:

    Spanish figurative marks ‘brillante’ for goods in Class 30 (Mark No 922772) and in Class 29 (Mark No 2413459)

    Decision of the Opposition Division:

    Opposition dismissed;

    Decision of the Board of Appeal:

    Appeal dismissed


    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Ebro Puleva, SA to pay the costs.

    Top