This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52012DC0771
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS on the implementation of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation Second Report - Annual Action Programmes for 2010 and 2011
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS on the implementation of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation Second Report - Annual Action Programmes for 2010 and 2011
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS on the implementation of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation Second Report - Annual Action Programmes for 2010 and 2011
/* COM/2012/0771 final */
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS on the implementation of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation Second Report - Annual Action Programmes for 2010 and 2011 /* COM/2012/0771 final */
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1........... INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 4 2........... INSC IMPLEMENTATION BY
BENEFICIARY........................................................ 6 3........... IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ANNUAL
ACTION PROGRAMMES
IN FIGURES................................................................................................................. 8 4........... CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................ 11 SUMMARY
This Report and the accompanying
Document to this Report relate to all Instrument for Nuclear Safety
Cooperation's (INSC) Annual Action Programmes (AAPs) since 2007 that are still
on-going in 2010 and 2011. It also describes the developments with respect to
the AAPs 2010 and 2011. The Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC
2007-2013) came into force on 1 January 2007. Its main objectives are to
support the promotion of a high level of nuclear safety, radiation protection
and the application of efficient and effective safeguards of nuclear material
in non-EU countries, worldwide. In 2010 and 2011, the INSC programme continued the
nuclear safety cooperation initiated with the countries of the former Soviet Union under the TACIS (Technical Assistance to the Commonwealth of Independent
States) program (see Art. 18 Report 2007-2009)[1],
but it had its geographical coverage extended to become global. The Indicative
Programme for 2010-2011 and the Annual Action Programmes (AAP) for the
respective years were adopted by the Commission taking into account the opinion
of the INSC Committee. The main goals of INSC over the period 2010-2011 were
strengthening the regulatory authorities in the Beneficiary Countries, to
promote an effective nuclear safety culture at all levels and to improve the
safe and responsible management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. Cooperation in the domain of nuclear safety was
progressively re-oriented towards a greater involvement with third countries'
nuclear regulatory authorities as well as to radioactive waste management and
site remediation. In this respect, the continued efforts on the remediation of
legacy uranium mining and processing sites in Central Asia should be
highlighted. Following the Fukushima-Daiichi accident, the Commission
invited countries covered by the EU Neighbourhood Policy to participate in the
discussions aimed at extending the comprehensive risk and safety assessments
("stress tests") of operating nuclear power plants (NPPs), including
a peer review of national reports, since it was considered that some of these
countries might benefit from cooperating with the Commission, in the framework
of the INSC, in carrying out the exercise. Ukraine decided to follow the same
schedule as for the stress tests within the European Union without requiring
INSC support. Armenia requested technical support to carry out the tests, which
was included under the INSC AAP 2011 part II. The main developments on nuclear safety cooperation and
assistance provided under the INSC in 2010 and 2011 are described in the Report
below. Further details on the projects under the Action Programmes from 2007 to
2011 are provided in the Commission Staff Working Document accompanying this
Report. 1. INTRODUCTION
This Report is submitted to the European Parliament and
the Council, and addressed to the Economic and Social Committee and to the
Committee of Regions, in compliance with the reporting requirement set out in
Article 18 of Council Regulation (EURATOM) No 300/2007 of 19
February 2007 establishing an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation[2] referred here below as the INSC
Regulation. To address the
safety concerns raised by Member States after the Chernobyl accident, in 1991 the Commission launched the nuclear safety component of the
TACIS programme. Between 1991 and
2006, more than €1.3 billion were committed to nuclear safety projects. Since 2007, the
EU's nuclear safety assistance and cooperation activities continued under the
Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC)[3]. The INSC has introduced a
number of changes compared to the TACIS Nuclear Safety Programme which are
worth noting. First, the
geographical coverage was no longer limited to the states of the former Soviet Union. It applies to third countries worldwide. This allows the Commission's
experience gained under the TACIS[4]
programme to be used elsewhere to address the needs of emerging countries, as
well as countries with established nuclear power programmes in need of nuclear
safety improvement, in particular those with rapidly expanding nuclear
programmes. In 2008, the Commission announced its broad strategy in a
Communication to the Council and Parliament[5]. In view of the
potential needs for nuclear safety cooperation worldwide, the EU Council
proposed a set of criteria to be observed when considering projects with new
countries[6].
The Commission took these criteria into account in its revised INSC Strategy
for 2010-2013[7]
which defined also geographical priorities. Second, the
TACIS programme focused on nuclear safety assistance including, in many
cases, supply of equipment ("hard assistance"), whereas the INSC
objective is enhanced cooperation with a view to improving nuclear safety
including the supply of equipment only in a limited number of cases or without
supply of equipment at all (‘soft assistance’). Partners are also encouraged to
take a more active role in the definition, management and implementation of the
programme and projects. The Commission
will continue to promote co-financing arrangements with partner organisations
generally providing contributions in kind (staff) and in supplies or works
(additional studies, civil works) on the basis of “a priori” detailed financing
plans. Third, the
enlarged geographical scope of the INSC, compared to TACIS, increased the need
for international cooperation and coordination of actions with other donors and
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The present
Report provides information on the Annual Action Programmes (AAPs) for 2010 and
2011, including projects approved until the end of 2011 and their status of
implementation by mid 2012. Projects foreseen under these AAPs for which the
contracting procedure had not yet been started are not mentioned. Initial difficulties in the transition phase from TACIS
to INSC, due primarily to delays in getting partner countries to sign Financing
Agreements under the new format, have meanwhile been largely overcome, with the
exception of the Russian Federation and Brazil. 2. INSC
IMPLEMENTATION BY BENEFICIARY
In Ukraine, the INSC continued providing targeted
support to the nuclear regulator and the NPP operator in improving nuclear
safety. It continued also to provide support to the radioactive waste
management and nuclear safeguards in general. Ukraine remained the main
beneficiary of INSC programme. The Chernobyl Shelter Fund (CSF) received
additional funds in 2010 and 2011 in order to complete the New Safe Confinement
by 2015. In the Russian Federation, projects initiated
under the TACIS programme continued under the INSC, but no new projects were
possible since a suitable cooperation framework could still not be agreed.
Discussions continued to explore possibilities to resume cooperation activities
with a reduced scope, but to no avail.
In Armenia, important projects were launched concerning the Medzamor
Nuclear Power Plant to address urgent safety issues while the plant is
operating. However, the Commission continued to maintain the position that the
plant cannot be upgraded to modern nuclear safety standards and therefore
should be closed down and decommissioned as soon as possible. Projects provided
for training of human resources, assistance to the nuclear regulator and
development of a radioactive waste management strategy in preparation for
future NPP decommissioning. In Belarus and Georgia, cooperation
continued with relatively small projects supporting both countries' nuclear
regulators as well as projects on radioactive waste management in Georgia. For Belarus, discussions took place to step-up the cooperation with the regulator
in order to improve its capabilities in anticipation of the construction of a
nuclear power plant in the country. A regional project aiming at creating a legislative and
regulatory framework for the remediation of uranium mining legacy sites in Central Asia was agreed. Cooperation projects with Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan are aimed at the remediation of various uranium production
legacy sites, and there is a cooperation project with Mongolia aimed at establishing a regulatory framework for uranium mines and milling
operations and training. The Programme was extended to new countries in three
regions: Countries covered by the European Neighbourhood
Policy: the cooperation projects under INSC provided support to nuclear
regulators; capacity building projects were launched in Egypt, Jordan and Morocco. However, the political events (Arab spring), among
others, have delayed the process. A project on building capabilities in
decommissioning, site and radioactive waste management started in Iraq (under the Instrument for Stability). This work will be extended, as
foreseen in AAP 2011, through a project to establish the safe disposal of
radioactive waste from various closed-down nuclear installations. South-East Asia: Projects
to support regulatory authorities were approved for the Philippines (not yet initiated) and Vietnam (started in mid-2012). A proposed
project concerning Malaysia was deferred to AAP 2012. Latin America: Projects
were launched with the nuclear safety regulator and the operator in Brazil under
AAP 2009 and 2010 (the AAP 2010 Part II Financing Agreement concerning the
nuclear operator project was not signed by the Brazilian authorities by end
2011, as required, the project had therefore to be cancelled). Contacts were
also established with Mexico and Argentina, and the first visits
took place in 2010. For Mexico, a project to support the nuclear regulator as
well as a project to develop a policy and strategy for the management of spent
fuel and radioactive waste were approved under AAP 2010 and have started in
2012. However, so far, no agreement was reached concerning the possibilities
for nuclear safety cooperation with Argentina. China: a cooperation project with the Chinese National Nuclear Regulatory
Authority and its TSO was approved under AAP 2011. It is aimed at enhancing the
nuclear safety regulatory regime in China in accordance with internationally
recognized standards and best practices, as well as strengthening China's preparedness for severe accidents and to assist in developing a strategy for the
management of radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. Cooperation with the IAEA
has been extended to support thematic technical activities at country or
regional level. Its aim was to further develop the safety culture, capacity
building of regulators, waste management, research reactors safety and seismic
safety. Significant financial support was provided to the Chernobyl
Shelter Fund (CSF) and the Nuclear Safety Account (NSA), managed by
the EBRD on behalf of the donor countries. The
stabilisation works of the existing shelter of the Chernobyl unit 4 were
completed. The design of the New Safe Confinement as well as the preparation of
the site for its assembly were approaching completion during the reporting
period. In a Pledging Conference in Kiev in April 2011, coinciding with the
commemorations of the 25th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident,
the €740 million needed to complete the project were pledged. The major
projects continued to progress according to the cost and schedule agreed in
2010 and their completion is foreseen for October 2015[8]. 3. IMPLEMENTATION
OF THE ANNUAL ACTION PROGRAMMES IN FIGURES The INSC Regulation was adopted on 19 February 2007. The
2007-2013 Strategy and the first Indicative Programme covering 2007-2009[9] were adopted by the Commission
on 8 August 2007. The Indicative Programme for 2010-2011 was approved and adopted in 2009[10]. Due to the time required for the adoption of Action
Programmes, on an annual basis, and the lengthy approval period by the partner
countries, the implementation of most projects under INSC only started in 2009
and the implementation of most projects under AAP 2010 and 2011 was due to
start in 2012. Annual Action Programme for 2010 (AAP2010) Allocations AAP2010 was presented in two parts: –
Part I – €7.7 million[11] –
Part II – €61.627 million[12] Implementation highlights by mid 2012 The Financing Agreements concerning AAP 2010 Part II
projects were all signed with the exception of the one concerning the Brazilian
operator (Brazil did not conclude the Financial Agreement by the end of 2011
and the respective project was cancelled). AAP 2010 Part I projects did not
require Financing Agreements[13].
Under AAP 2010, contracts have so far been signed with Jordan
(a project of €1.2 million was contracted to provide assistance related to
developing and strengthening the capabilities of the Jordan Nuclear Regulatory
Authority) and Mexico (2 projects amounting to some €3 million were
contracted concerning cooperation with the Regulatory Authority of Mexico and
cooperation in the development of a policy and strategy for the management of
spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste in Mexico). Furthermore, contracts
were signed for "multi-country" projects (three projects for
€3.475 million to establish connecting networks to enhance communication and
training systems in radioactive waste management as well as several training
and tutoring activities for regulator and TSO experts) and "multi-IAEA"
projects (€4 million contribution to support IAEA projects managed by Technical
Cooperation and Nuclear Installation Safety Departments). In December 2010, a payment of €17 million was made to
the Chernobyl Shelter Fund in anticipation of the 4th EU pledge by
the Commission, which was to be made in 2011. Annual Action Programme for 2011 (AAP2011) Allocations AAP2011 was also presented in two parts: –
Part I – €38.7 million[14] –
Part II – €35.9 million[15] Implementation highlights by mid-2012 The Financing Agreements concerning AP 2011 Part II
projects were being prepared or being transmitted to partner countries. They
need to be signed before the end of 2012.. AP 2011 Part I projects did not
require Financing Agreements. Under AAP 2011, a contract was signed to support the
operator in the implementation of the "stress tests" at the Armenian
Nuclear Power Plant (ANPP). A second contract was signed to support the
Armenian nuclear regulator (ANRA) in reviewing the operator's self-assessment
report. These technical support projects amounting to some €1.8 million were
being prepared for implementation. It is worth noting the fact that the
Armenian government had accepted to participate in the comprehensive risk and
safety assessment exercise ("stress tests") launched by the EU and joined
by neighbour countries. In April 2011 the Commission pledged €122 million in EU
support to the two Chernobyl Funds "Chernobyl Shelter Funds" and
"Nuclear Safety Account" at a Pledging Conference in Kiev. The Pledging conference raised in total €740 million, the sum needed to complete the
projects according to the cost estimates and schedule agreed in 2010. Over the
period covered by this Report the Chernobyl projects continued to progress
according to the agreed cost and schedule, the completion is foreseen for October
2015. A third instalment of €34 million was paid to the
Chernobyl Shelter Fund under AAP 2011, in accordance with the pledge made in
2011. Summary table
Use of INSC Programme funds
(€ million - situation by mid 2012) Year || Funds Committed[16] || Contracted || Paid 2010 || 69,327 || 35,908 || 22,940 2011 || 74,608 || 37,002 || 34,423 4. CONCLUSIONS The present
Report is limited in terms of achievements and impact due to the relatively
early stage of implementation of the INSC programme. During the reporting
period, only a few projects have been completed. Most projects are under
preparation or currently being implemented. As of mid 2012,
some 50 projects under the AAPs 2007-2009 and a further 30 projects under the
AAPs for 2010 and 2011 are at various stages of implementation. Several of
these projects are split into a number of different sub-projects for separate
contracting. Contracting documents are currently under preparation for most
projects under the AAPs 2010 and 2011. All of these projects are fully
compliant with the objectives of the INSC Regulation. The enhancement
of the nuclear safety culture through INSC incorporates lessons learned from
the TACIS Nuclear Safety programme, while properly addressing emerging needs
within a mandate no longer restricted to the former Soviet Union. The INSC
programme continued the actions initiated under TACIS, mainly in Eastern Europe but, progressively, cooperation was extended in geographical scope as well
as in content. Cooperation with nuclear regulators continued to grow while that
with operators was scaled down and the development of responsible management of
spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste, decommissioning and site remediation
gained increasing importance. Contributions to the Chernobyl Funds continued to
consume a significant part of the yearly budget, but these should end in 2013. The
geographical coverage of the programme increased steadily from four countries
in 2007 to some 15 countries in 2010 and 2011, cooperation with others
continued to be explored. The number of beneficiary countries was expected to
reach 17 with the AAP 2012. The INSC
implementation in 2010 and 2011 is considered to be well-targeted, the approved
projects well-conceived and the projects, once contracted (only a limited
number had been contracted so far), were developing well. When successfully
implemented, they will contribute significantly to enhancing nuclear safety and
nuclear safety culture in the beneficiary countries. The
discontinuation of cooperation with the Russian Federation under the INSC in
the fields of nuclear regulation, improvement of operational safety and
establishment of responsible management of radioactive waste, decommissioning
and remediation was a disappointing development. Considering the impact also on
neighbouring countries, the fact that the Russian Federation is a major
exporter of nuclear technology and the mutual benefits that would result from
further cooperation between the EU and the Russian Federation, the Commission
will continue to seek ways for effective and mutually satisfactory cooperation
with the Russian Federation on a partnership basis. [1] Report from the Commission to the European
Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the
Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the Instrument for Nuclear
Safety Cooperation – First Report – Annual Action Programmes for 2007, 2008 and
2009 [2] Art. 18 of the INSC Regulation requires that 'The Commission shall examine progress achieved in implementing the
measures undertaken pursuant to this Regulation and shall submit to the
European Parliament and the Council an annual report on the implementation of
the assistance. The Report shall also be addressed to the Economic and Social
Committee and to the Committee of Regions. The Report shall contain information
relating to the previous year on the measures financed, information on the
results of monitoring and evaluation exercises and the implementation of budget
commitments and payments, broken down by country, region and cooperation
sector'. [3] Council Regulation (Euratom) No 300/2007 of 19
February 2007 establishing an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (OJ L
81, 22.3.2007, p. 1). [4] TACIS (Technical Assistance to the Commonwealth of
Independent States) was the European Commission Programme to assist 12
countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan) and Mongolia in their transition towards
democratic market-oriented economies. [5] See the Communication "Addressing the international
challenge of nuclear safety and security" (COM (2008) 312 final, 22 May
2008 [6] Council
Conclusions on assistance to 3rd countries in the field of nuclear
safety and security, 9 Dec. 2008. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/trans/104601.pdf [7] Revised Strategy for Community Cooperation Programmes
in the field of Nuclear Safety for the period 2010-2013 ( C(2009)0922 ) [8] TACIS nuclear safety projects
on radioactive waste management were still on-going at the Chernobyl NPP site
during the reporting period. [9] Commission Decision C/2007/3758 of 01.08.2007 [10] Commission Decision C/2009/9820 of 08.12.2009 [11] Commission Decision C (2010) 4283 of 29 June 2010 [12] Commission Decision C (2010) 8265 of 29 November 2010 [13] Part I projects of AAP 2010 and 2011 did/do not require
a Financing Agreement since they are usually managed by direct payments to i.e.
international organisations. These payments require a Contribution Agreement
instead. [14] Commission Decision C (2011) 5784 of 17 August 2011 [15] Commission Decision C (2011) 9268 of 16 December 2011 [16] Primary commitments = final commitments under AAP 2010
and AAP 2011