This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CO0200
Summary of the Order
Summary of the Order
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 March 2012 — Italy v Commission
(Case C-200/11 P)
‛Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — State aid — Incompatibility with the common market — Commission decision — Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 1(c) — Alteration of existing aid — Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 — Article 4(1) — Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding’
|
1. |
State aid — Commission decision finding a national measure compatible with Article 87(1) EC — Determining the scope of the decision — Account taken not only of the wording of the decision, but also of the content notified (Art. 87(1) EC) (see para. 27) |
|
2. |
State aid — Existing aid and new aid — Measure amending an existing aid scheme — Treated as new aid (Council Regulation No 659/1999, Art. 1(c)); Commission Regulation No 794/2004, Art. 4(1)) (see paras 30, 31) |
|
3. |
State aid — Planned aid — Examination by the Commission — Application of the rules of substantive law in force when the Commission took its decision (Art. 88(3) EC; Council Regulation No 1177/2002, Art. 5) (see paras 37-39, 43) |
|
4. |
State aid — Planned aid — Notifying the Commission — Scope of the obligation — Necessary for notification to include estimates of the total amounts of the aid planned on account of their impact on that aid (Art. 88(3), EC; Council Regulation No 1177/2002) (see paras 47-49) |
|
5. |
Appeals — Setting out in the application of the pleas in law and legal arguments — Plea in law not clear enough — Whether inadmissible (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 52-54) |
|
6. |
State aid — Commission decision finding a national measure compatible with Article 87(1) EC — No legitimate expectations in the case of alteration to the aid scheme going beyond the bounds of the authorisation decision (Art. 87(1) EC) (see paras 65-68) |
|
7. |
Union law — Principles — Equal treatment — Meaning — Unequal treatment as a result of the temporal limitation of authorisation to grant State aid in a given sector of the market — Whether objectively justified (Council Regulation No 1177/2002, Art. 5) (see paras 74-76) |
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 February 2011 in Case T-3/09 Italy v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/38/EC of 21 October 2008 on State aid C 20/08 (ex N 62/08) which Italy is planning to implement through a modification of scheme N 59/04 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding (OJ 2010 L 17, p. 50).
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 March 2012 — Italy v Commission
(Case C-200/11 P)
‛Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — State aid — Incompatibility with the common market — Commission decision — Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 1(c) — Alteration of existing aid — Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 — Article 4(1) — Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding’
|
1. |
State aid — Commission decision finding a national measure compatible with Article 87(1) EC — Determining the scope of the decision — Account taken not only of the wording of the decision, but also of the content notified (Art. 87(1) EC) (see para. 27) |
|
2. |
State aid — Existing aid and new aid — Measure amending an existing aid scheme — Treated as new aid (Council Regulation No 659/1999, Art. 1(c)); Commission Regulation No 794/2004, Art. 4(1)) (see paras 30, 31) |
|
3. |
State aid — Planned aid — Examination by the Commission — Application of the rules of substantive law in force when the Commission took its decision (Art. 88(3) EC; Council Regulation No 1177/2002, Art. 5) (see paras 37-39, 43) |
|
4. |
State aid — Planned aid — Notifying the Commission — Scope of the obligation — Necessary for notification to include estimates of the total amounts of the aid planned on account of their impact on that aid (Art. 88(3), EC; Council Regulation No 1177/2002) (see paras 47-49) |
|
5. |
Appeals — Setting out in the application of the pleas in law and legal arguments — Plea in law not clear enough — Whether inadmissible (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 52-54) |
|
6. |
State aid — Commission decision finding a national measure compatible with Article 87(1) EC — No legitimate expectations in the case of alteration to the aid scheme going beyond the bounds of the authorisation decision (Art. 87(1) EC) (see paras 65-68) |
|
7. |
Union law — Principles — Equal treatment — Meaning — Unequal treatment as a result of the temporal limitation of authorisation to grant State aid in a given sector of the market — Whether objectively justified (Council Regulation No 1177/2002, Art. 5) (see paras 74-76) |
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 February 2011 in Case T-3/09 Italy v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/38/EC of 21 October 2008 on State aid C 20/08 (ex N 62/08) which Italy is planning to implement through a modification of scheme N 59/04 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding (OJ 2010 L 17, p. 50).
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |