Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010TJ0348

Panzeri v OHMI - Royal Trophy (Royal Veste e premia lo sport)

Keywords
Subject of the case
Operative part

Keywords

Community trade mark 

—

Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark 

—

Relative grounds for refusal 

—

Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services 

—

Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 31, 39, 40

)

Subject of the case

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 May 2010 (Case R 988/2009‑1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Luigi Panzeri and Royal Trophy Srl.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 May 2010 (Case R 988/2009‑1);

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

Top

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2012 — Panzeri v OHIM — Royal Trophy (Royal Veste e premia lo sport)

(Case T-348/10)

‛Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community mark Royal Veste e premia lo sport — Earlier Community and international word marks veste lo sport — Earlier unregistered figurative mark panzeri veste lo sport — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009’

Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 31, 39, 40)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 May 2010 (Case R 988/2009-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Luigi Panzeri and Royal Trophy Srl.

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 May 2010 (Case R 988/2009-1);

2. 

Orders each party to bear its own costs.
Top