Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009TO0198

UOP v Commission

Keywords
Subject of the case
Operative part

Keywords

Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Commission decision terminating an aid proceeding — Competitor of the undertaking receiving the aid — Right to bring an action — Conditions (Arts 88(2) EC and 230, fourth para., EC) (see paras 22-27, 35)

2. Procedure — Time-limit for producing evidence — Article 48(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Scope (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 48(1) and 66(2)) (see para. 32)

Subject of the case

Re:

APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2009/157/EC of 16 July 2008 on the aid measure implemented by France for the IFP Group (C 51/05 (ex NN 84/05)) (OJ 2009 L 53, p. 13).

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. UOP Ltd is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and IFP.

Top

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 March 2013 — UOP v Commission

(Case T-198/09)

‛Action for annulment — State aid — No individual concern — Inadmissibility’

1. 

Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Commission decision terminating an aid proceeding — Competitor of the undertaking receiving the aid — Right to bring an action — Conditions (Arts 88(2) EC and 230, fourth para., EC) (see paras 22-27, 35)

2. 

Procedure — Time-limit for producing evidence — Article 48(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Scope (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 48(1) and 66(2)) (see para. 32)

Re:

APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2009/157/EC of 16 July 2008 on the aid measure implemented by France for the IFP Group (C 51/05 (ex NN 84/05)) (OJ 2009 L 53, p. 13).

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. 

UOP Ltd is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and IFP.

Top