Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CJ0942

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 June 2021.
Servicio Aragonés de Salud v LB.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Rejection of a request for leave of absence by reason of employment in the public sector provided for permanent staff regulated under administrative law – National legislation excluding entitlement to such leave when taking up temporary employment – Scope – Inapplicability of clause 4 – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.
Case C-942/19.

Court reports – general

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:440

Case C‑942/19

Servicio Aragonés de Salud

v

LB

(Request for a preliminary ruling
from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Aragón)

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 June 2021

(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Rejection of a request for leave of absence by reason of employment in the public sector provided for permanent staff regulated under administrative law – National legislation excluding entitlement to such leave when taking up temporary employment – Scope – Inapplicability of clause 4 – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

  1. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – Request for interpretation of provisions of EU law manifestly inapplicable in the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court

    (Art. 267 TFEU; Council Directive 1999/70, Annex)

    (see paragraphs 28, 29, 38, operative part)

  2. Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Directive 1999/70 – Scope

    (Council Directive 1999/70, Annex, clauses 2(1) and (2), 3(1) and 4)

    (see paragraphs 31, 32, 35, 37)

See the text of the decision.

Top