EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0125
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2003. # Peter Pflücke v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Sozialgericht Leipzig - Germany. # Protection of workers - Insolvency of the employer - Guarantee of payment of outstanding salary - National provision laying down a two-month time-limit for lodging applications for payment and providing for an extension of that time-limit. # Case C-125/01.
Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 18. septembra 2003.
Peter Pflücke proti Bundesanstalt für Arbeit.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe: Sozialgericht Leipzig - Nemčija.
Zadeva C-125/01.
Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 18. septembra 2003.
Peter Pflücke proti Bundesanstalt für Arbeit.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe: Sozialgericht Leipzig - Nemčija.
Zadeva C-125/01.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:477
*A9* Sozialgericht Leipzig, Beschluß vom 21/02/2001 (S 4 AL 781/99)
«(Protection of workers – Insolvency of the employer – Guarantee of payment of outstanding salary – National provision laying down a two-month time-limit for lodging applications for payment and providing for an extension of that time-limit)»
|
||||
|
||||
(Council Directive 80/987)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
18 September 2003 (1)
((Protection of workers – Insolvency of the employer – Guarantee of payment of outstanding salary – National provision laying down a two-month time-limit for lodging applications for payment and providing for an extension of that time-limit))
In Case C-125/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Sozialgericht Leipzig (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Peter Pflückeand
Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, on the interpretation of Article 9 of Council Directive 80/987/EEC of 20 October 1980 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer (OJ 1980 L 283, p. 23),THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the report of the Judge-Rapporteur,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 24 September 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
in answer to the questions referred to it by the Sozialgericht Leipzig by order of 21 February 2001, hereby rules:
Wathelet |
Timmermans |
Edward |
Jann |
Rosas |
|
R. Grass |
M. Wathelet |
Registrar |
President of the Fifth Chamber |