Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 91998E003543

    WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3543/98 by Roberta ANGELILLI to the Commission. Sale of the Maccarese farm

    Ú. v. ES C 207, 21.7.1999, p. 86 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

    European Parliament's website

    91998E3543

    WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3543/98 by Roberta ANGELILLI to the Commission. Sale of the Maccarese farm

    Official Journal C 207 , 21/07/1999 P. 0086


    WRITTEN QUESTION E-3543/98

    by Roberta Angelilli (NI) to the Commission

    (1 December 1998)

    Subject: Sale of the Maccarese farm

    The large Maccarese farm just outside Rome, hitherto owned by a public company, Iritecna, is about to be put up for sale. Offers are being considered from a number of potential buyers, including the Benetton Group, which, it is thought, may be intending to use the property for public relations purposes or at any rate not for farming. Some local agricultural cooperatives and the farm's present work-force have also expressed an interest in buying the land, and the local authorities have therefore been asked to take steps to enable them, should they so decide, to exercise their right of pre-emption.

    In the light of the foregoing:

    1. Does the Commission not believe that local agricultural production, already in difficulty, could be severely hit by the change of ownership of the farm?

    2. Are there any Directives or acts which allow farm workers to exercise a right of pre-emption in such cases, bearing in mind that they may be in danger of losing their jobs?

    3. What is the Commission's general view of the matter?

    Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

    (13 January 1999)

    Under Article 222, the EC Treaty does not in any way prejudice the rules in Member States governing the system of property ownership. There are no Directives or other acts in Community law containing provisions allowing agricultural cooperatives or workers to exercise a right of pre-emption when the holding on which they work is sold. Any provisions establishing such a right for the above entities, to which the Honourable Member refers, would thus be governed exclusively by national law.

    The Commission may not therefore demand the application of a provision establishing a right of pre-emption on the sale of the Maccarese farm.

    From a more general point of view, the Commission may not give an opinion on this matter in the absence of specific elements on which it would be called to give an opinion under the terms of the applicable legal provisions.

    Top