Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 91998E003391

    WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3391/98 by Nikitas KAKLAMANIS to the Commission. CEDEFOP

    Ú. v. ES C 207, 21.7.1999, p. 63 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

    European Parliament's website

    91998E3391

    WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3391/98 by Nikitas KAKLAMANIS to the Commission. CEDEFOP

    Official Journal C 207 , 21/07/1999 P. 0063


    WRITTEN QUESTION E-3391/98

    by Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) to the Commission

    (17 November 1998)

    Subject: Cedefop

    In his answer of 19.10.1998 to my Question E-2549/98(1) Commissioner Liikanen stated that, as far as Cedefop personnel policy was concerned, "the Commission exercises controls only insofar as it is represented on the governing board of the Centre." To this he added the interesting rider that "in the sphere of personnel management, relations between the Commission and (outside) bodies are more informal". Despite this the Commission promotes funding requests by the decentralised bodies (including Cedefop, of course) before the European Parliament's Committee on Budgets and argues in favour of supporting them. It is therefore curious that the highly sensitive "function" (as Commissioner Liikanen himself states in his answer) of appointing personnel "has been delegated to the Director of the Centre for all categories and grades of staff", as the Commissioner adds. The delegation of wholesale responsibility in this area to the Director of the Centre is incompatible with Mr Liikanen's admission that Cedefop has not brought its practices into line with those of the institutions of the Union as regards the implementation of the "Staff Regulations of officials of the EC and the conditions of employment of other servants": for this reason advice is being given to the above Centre to help it come into line. The whole matter is highly sensitive and has been repeatedly discussed in the Greek press. One thing is certain: the recruitment practices of the Centre show no sign of coming into line with those of the other Community institutions.

    Will the Commission say whether it has considered the full ramifications of the problem of Cedefop recruitment, what conclusions it has reached concerning the allegations made by the press about machinations involving recruitment, and how it intends to react to ensure that transparent and unimpeachable staff recruitment procedures are adopted at the Centre, which will serve to protect both the Centre itself and the reputation of Thessaloniki, the host City?

    Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

    (22 January 1999)

    The Commission has nothing to add to its previous answer to Written Question E-2549/98(2) asked by the Honourable Member.

    (1) OJ C 118, 29.4.1999, p. 92.

    (2) OJ C 118, 29.4.1999, p. 92.

    Top