This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/048/32
Case C-448/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris by judgment of that court of 18 November 2005 in Vestel France SA v Administration des Douanes et Droits Indirects
Case C-448/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris by judgment of that court of 18 November 2005 in Vestel France SA v Administration des Douanes et Droits Indirects
Case C-448/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris by judgment of that court of 18 November 2005 in Vestel France SA v Administration des Douanes et Droits Indirects
JO C 48, 25.2.2006, p. 17–17
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.2.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 48/17 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris by judgment of that court of 18 November 2005 in Vestel France SA v Administration des Douanes et Droits Indirects
(Case C-448/05)
(2006/C 48/32)
Language of the case: French
Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by judgment of the Cour d'appel de Paris (Paris Court of Appeal) of 18 November 2005, received at the Court Registry on 16 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Vestel France SA and Administration des Douanes et Droits Indirects on the following question:
‘Is Annex 11 to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 (1) invalid as being contrary to Article 24 of Council Regulation No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (2) in that it has the result that a television receiver manufactured in Turkey in the circumstances described in the proceedings is held to be of Chinese origin?’
(1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 253, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 302, p. 1.