This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/205/37
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2005 in Case T-34/04 Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Turkish Power’ — Earlier word mark POWER — Opposition proceedings — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2005 in Case T-34/04 Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Turkish Power’ — Earlier word mark POWER — Opposition proceedings — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2005 in Case T-34/04 Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Turkish Power’ — Earlier word mark POWER — Opposition proceedings — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
JO C 205, 20.8.2005, p. 21–21
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.8.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 205/21 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 22 June 2005
in Case T-34/04 Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
(Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Turkish Power’ - Earlier word mark POWER - Opposition proceedings - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2005/C 205/37)
Language of the case: German
In Case T-34/04: Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH, established in Mühlheim (Germany), represented by B. Piepenbrink, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the other parties to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal having been Joachim Bälz and Friemar Hiller, residing in Stuttgart (Germany) — action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 November 2003 (Case R 620/2002-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft and Bälz and Hiller — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Lindh and V. Vadapalas, Judges; C. Kristensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 22 June 2005, in which it:
|
1. |
Dismisses the application; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |