This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/182/68
Order of the Court of First Instance of 28 February 2005 in Case T-445/04 Energy Technologies ET S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Representation by a lawyer — Manifest inadmissibility)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 28 February 2005 in Case T-445/04 Energy Technologies ET S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Representation by a lawyer — Manifest inadmissibility)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 28 February 2005 in Case T-445/04 Energy Technologies ET S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Representation by a lawyer — Manifest inadmissibility)
JO C 182, 23.7.2005, p. 36–36
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
23.7.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 182/36 |
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 28 February 2005
in Case T-445/04 Energy Technologies ET S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
(Community trade mark - Representation by a lawyer - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2005/C 182/68)
Language of the case: English
In Case T-445/04: Energy Technologies ET S.A., established in Fribourg (Switzerland), represented by A. Boman, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Aparellaje eléctrico, SL, established in Hospitalet de Llobregat (Spain) — action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 7 July 2004 (Case R 366/2002-4) concerning an application for registration of the word mark UNEX as a Community trade mark — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 28 February 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
The applicant shall bear its own costs. |