This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2004/021/09
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 December 2003 in Case C-448/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt): EVN AG, Wienstrom GmbH v Republik Österreich, third parties: Stadtwerke Klagenfurt AG and Kärntner Elektrizitäts-AG (Directive 93/36/EEC — Public supply contracts — Concept of the most economically advantageous tender — Award criterion giving preference to electricity produced from renewable energy sources — Directive 89/665/EEC — Public procurement review proceedings — Unlawful decisions — Possibility of annulment only in the case of material influence on the outcome of the tender procedure — Illegality of an award criterion — Obligation to cancel the invitation to tender)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 December 2003 in Case C-448/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt): EVN AG, Wienstrom GmbH v Republik Österreich, third parties: Stadtwerke Klagenfurt AG and Kärntner Elektrizitäts-AG (Directive 93/36/EEC — Public supply contracts — Concept of the most economically advantageous tender — Award criterion giving preference to electricity produced from renewable energy sources — Directive 89/665/EEC — Public procurement review proceedings — Unlawful decisions — Possibility of annulment only in the case of material influence on the outcome of the tender procedure — Illegality of an award criterion — Obligation to cancel the invitation to tender)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 December 2003 in Case C-448/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt): EVN AG, Wienstrom GmbH v Republik Österreich, third parties: Stadtwerke Klagenfurt AG and Kärntner Elektrizitäts-AG (Directive 93/36/EEC — Public supply contracts — Concept of the most economically advantageous tender — Award criterion giving preference to electricity produced from renewable energy sources — Directive 89/665/EEC — Public procurement review proceedings — Unlawful decisions — Possibility of annulment only in the case of material influence on the outcome of the tender procedure — Illegality of an award criterion — Obligation to cancel the invitation to tender)
JO C 21, 24.1.2004, p. 5–5
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)