Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 92000E000292

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0292/00 by Glenys Kinnock (PSE) to the Commission. Zimbabwean defence of asbestos industry.

JO C 374E, 28.12.2000, p. 52–52 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website

92000E0292

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0292/00 by Glenys Kinnock (PSE) to the Commission. Zimbabwean defence of asbestos industry.

Official Journal 374 E , 28/12/2000 P. 0052 - 0052


WRITTEN QUESTION E-0292/00

by Glenys Kinnock (PSE) to the Commission

(11 February 2000)

Subject: Zimbabwean defence of asbestos industry

In view of the fact that EU Member States have until 2005 to remove all white asbestos from the market, how does the Commission intend to deal with the claim made by the Zimbabwean government that their white asbestos mine is safe?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(29 February 2000)

In August 1999, the former Member responsible for development, Mr Pinheiro, on behalf of the President of the Commission, wrote to the Zimbabwean minister of industry and commerce, Mr Shamuyarira, regarding a request for assistance to restructure the asbestos industry and communities affected by the Community ban on asbestos.

The Commission maintained that the Community proposal to ban chrysolite asbestos was based on solid scientific evidence taking due regard of the independent scientific committee on toxicity, ecotoxicity and the environment, which stated that no safe threshold for crysolite asbestos can be identified; of the absence of contrary evidence to dispute the fact that all types of asbestos may cause lung cancer and mesothelioma, a form of cancer of the lining of the lungs and of the fact that evidence indicates that the main substitutes for chrysolite asbestos are likely to be less dangerous and should therefore be used in all cases.

In respect of Zimbabwe's request for assistance for transitional arrangements for the asbestos industry, the Commission suggested that the National authorising officer contact directly the Commission head of delegation in Harare to further discuss the possibilities and resources for assistance available under the national indicative programme or the System of stabilization of export earnings from mining products (SYSMIN) facility. To date, the Zimbabwean government has not replied to this offer.

Top