EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62002CJ0151
Judgment of the Court of 9 September 2003.#Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Norbert Jaeger.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Landesarbeitsgericht Schleswig-Holstein - Germany.#Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 93/104/EC - Concepts of working time and rest period - On-call service (Bereitschaftsdienst) provided by doctors in hospitals.#Case C-151/02.
Hotărârea Curții din data de 9 septembrie 2003.
Landeshauptstadt Kiel împotriva Norbert Jaeger.
Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Landesarbeitsgericht Schleswig-Holstein - Germania.
Politica socială - Directivă 93/104/CE.
Cauza C-151/02.
Hotărârea Curții din data de 9 septembrie 2003.
Landeshauptstadt Kiel împotriva Norbert Jaeger.
Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Landesarbeitsgericht Schleswig-Holstein - Germania.
Politica socială - Directivă 93/104/CE.
Cauza C-151/02.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:437
«(Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 93/104/EC – Concepts of working time and rest period – On-call service (Bereitschaftsdienst) provided by doctors in hospitals)»
|
||||
|
||||
(Council Directive 93/104, Art. 2(1) and (2))
(Council Directive 93/104, Art. 2(1))
(Council Directive 93/104)
(Council Directive 93/104, Art. 17(2))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
9 September 2003 (1)
((Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 93/104/EC – Concepts of working time and rest period – On-call service (Bereitschaftsdienst) provided by doctors in hospitals))
In Case C-151/02, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Landesarbeitsgericht Schleswig-Holstein (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Landeshauptstadt Kieland
Norbert Jaeger, on the interpretation of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 1993 L 307, p. 18) and, in particular, Articles 2(1) and (3) thereof,THE COURT,,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of Landeshauptstadt Kiel, represented by W. Weißleder, M. Bechtold and D. Seckler, Rechtsanwälte, of Mr Jaeger, represented by F. Schramm, of the German Government, represented by W.-D. Plessing, of the French Government, represented by C. Lemaire, acting as Agent, of the Netherlands Government, represented by N.A.J. Bel, acting as Agent, of the United Kingdom Government, represented by P. Ormond, and K. Smith, and of the Commission, represented by H. Kreppel and F. Hoffmeister, acting as Agent, at the hearing on 25 February 2003,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 8 April 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT,
in answer to the questions referred to it by the Landesarbeitsgericht Schleswig-Holstein by order of 12 March 2002, amended by order of 25 March 2002, hereby rules:
Rodríguez Iglesias |
Wathelet |
Schintgen |
Timmermans |
Gulmann |
Edward |
Jann |
Skouris |
Macken |
Colneric |
von Bahr |
Cunha Rodrigues |
Rosas |
R. Grass |
G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias |
Registrar |
President |