This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 61988CC0344
Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 11 January 1990. # Erich Wittmann GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg-Fürth. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht München - Germany. # Common Customs Tariff - Ear-piercing instruments and stud earrings. # Case C-344/88.
Concluziile avocatului general Mischo prezentate la data de11 ianuarie 1990.
Erich Wittmann GmbH & Co. KG împotriva Hauptzollamt Nürnberg-Fürth.
Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Finanzgericht München - Germania.
Tariful vamal comun.
Cauza C-344/88.
Concluziile avocatului general Mischo prezentate la data de11 ianuarie 1990.
Erich Wittmann GmbH & Co. KG împotriva Hauptzollamt Nürnberg-Fürth.
Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Finanzgericht München - Germania.
Tariful vamal comun.
Cauza C-344/88.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1990:9
Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 11 January 1990. - Erich Wittmann GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg-Fürth. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht München - Germany. - Common Customs Tariff - Ear-piercing instruments and stud earrings. - Case C-344/88.
European Court reports 1990 Page I-01505
Pub.RJ Page Pub somm
++++
Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered his Opinion on 11 January 1990 . (*) He proposed that the Court should give the following two answers to the questions referred by the Finanzgericht Muenchen :
( 1 ) Heading 71.16 of the Common Customs Tariff must be interpreted as having included, even before the adoption of Commission Regulation No 3558/81 of 8 December 1981, shanks for earrings of the kind designated in that regulation .
( 2 ) Subheading 84.59 E II must be interpreted as including the guns designed to pierce the ear-lobe and insert the object referred to in the answer to the first question .
(*) Original language : French .