EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CO0036
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2019.
Daico International BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark RoB — Declaration of revocation — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 62(3) — Due notification — Appeal manifestly unfounded.
Case C-36/19 P.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2019.
Daico International BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark RoB — Declaration of revocation — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 62(3) — Due notification — Appeal manifestly unfounded.
Case C-36/19 P.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2019 — Daico International v EUIPO
(Case C‑36/19 P)
(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark RoB — Declaration of revocation — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 62(3) — Due notification — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
EU trade mark — Procedural provisions — Notification — Notification by registered letter — Calculation of time limits — Date of receipt
(Commission Regulation No 2868/95, Art. 1, Rule 62(3))
(see para. 5)
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
|
2. |
Daico International BV shall bear its own costs. |