This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/310/29
Case T-499/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October 2006 — Hammarplast v OHIM — Steninge Slott (STENINGE SLOTT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark STENINGE SLOTT — Earlier word mark STENINGE KERAMIK — Likelihood of confusion)
Case T-499/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October 2006 — Hammarplast v OHIM — Steninge Slott (STENINGE SLOTT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark STENINGE SLOTT — Earlier word mark STENINGE KERAMIK — Likelihood of confusion)
Case T-499/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October 2006 — Hammarplast v OHIM — Steninge Slott (STENINGE SLOTT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark STENINGE SLOTT — Earlier word mark STENINGE KERAMIK — Likelihood of confusion)
JO C 310, 16.12.2006, p. 15–15
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 16/12/2006; data publicării
- Author:
- Tribunalul de Primă Instanţă
- Form:
- Informații juridice
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
16.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 310/15 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October 2006 — Hammarplast v OHIM — Steninge Slott (STENINGE SLOTT)
(Case T-499/04) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark STENINGE SLOTT - Earlier word mark STENINGE KERAMIK - Likelihood of confusion)
(2006/C 310/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hammarplast AB (Tingsryd, Sweden) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Steninge Slott AB (Märast, Sweden) (represented by: M. Björkenfeldt, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2004 (Case R 394/2003-2) concerning the opposition filed by the holder of the national trade mark STENINGE KERAMIK against registration of the Community trade mark STENINGE SLOTT.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
