Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/096/18

    Case T-282/02: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 February 2006 — Cementbouw Handel & Industrie BV v Commission (Competition — Control of concentration of undertakings — Articles 2, 3 and 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 — Concept of concentration — Creation of a dominant position — Authorisation subject to compliance with certain commitments — Principle of proportionality)

    JO C 96, 22.4.2006, p. 10–10 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    22.4.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 96/10


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 February 2006 — Cementbouw Handel & Industrie BV v Commission

    (Case T-282/02) (1)

    (Competition - Control of concentration of undertakings - Articles 2, 3 and 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 - Concept of concentration - Creation of a dominant position - Authorisation subject to compliance with certain commitments - Principle of proportionality)

    (2006/C 96/18)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Cementbouw Handel & Industrie BV (Le Cruquius, Netherlands) (represented by: W. Knibbeler, O. Brouwer and P. Kreijger, lawyers)

    Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially, A. Nijenhuis, K. Wiedner and W. Mölls, and subsequently A. Nijenhuis, E. Gippini Fournier and A. Whelan, acting as Agents)

    Application for

    annulment of Commission Decision 2003/756/EC of 26 June 2002, relating to a procedure pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89, declaring a merger to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2650 — Haniel/Cementbouw/JV (CVK)) (OJ 2003 L 282, p. 1, corrigendum published in OJ 2003 L 285, p. 52)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the application;

    2.

    Orders the applicant to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 274 of 9.11.2002.


    Top