EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/205/40
Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 May 2005 in Case T-330/04 Jörg-Michael Fetzer v European Parliament (Preliminary issues — Objection of inadmissibility — Expiry of the period for bringing an action — Manifest inadmissibility)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 May 2005 in Case T-330/04 Jörg-Michael Fetzer v European Parliament (Preliminary issues — Objection of inadmissibility — Expiry of the period for bringing an action — Manifest inadmissibility)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 May 2005 in Case T-330/04 Jörg-Michael Fetzer v European Parliament (Preliminary issues — Objection of inadmissibility — Expiry of the period for bringing an action — Manifest inadmissibility)
JO C 205, 20.8.2005, p. 22–22
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 20/08/2005; data publicării
- Author:
- Tribunalul de Primă Instanţă
- Form:
- Informații juridice
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
20.8.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 205/22 |
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 25 May 2005
in Case T-330/04 Jörg-Michael Fetzer v European Parliament (1)
(Preliminary issues - Objection of inadmissibility - Expiry of the period for bringing an action - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2005/C 205/40)
Language of the case: German
In Case T-330/04: Jörg-Michael Fetzer, residing in Tübingen (Germany), represented by M. Bauer, lawyer, against European Parliament (Agents: N. Lorenz and L.G. Knudsen, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annulment of the decision of the Selection Board for Competition PE/96/A not to include the applicant on the reserve list of that competition and, in the alternative, for an order requiring the defendant to pay appropriate damages — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, J. Azizi and E. Cremona, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 25 May 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
|
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |
