This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0283
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 November 2003.#Shield Mark BV v Joost Kist h.o.d.n. Memex.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Hoge Raad der Nederlanden - Netherlands.#Trade marks - Approximation of laws - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 2 - Signs of which a trade mark may consist - Signs capable of being represented graphically - Sound signs - Musical notation - Written description - Onomatopoeia.#Case C-283/01.
Hotărârea Curții (camera a șasea) din data de 27 noiembrie 2003.
Shield Mark BV împotriva Joost Kist h.o.d.n. Memex.
Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Hoge Raad der Nederlanden - Țările de Jos.
Apropierea legislațiilor - Directivă 89/104/CEE - Articol 2.
Cauza C-283/01.
Hotărârea Curții (camera a șasea) din data de 27 noiembrie 2003.
Shield Mark BV împotriva Joost Kist h.o.d.n. Memex.
Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Hoge Raad der Nederlanden - Țările de Jos.
Apropierea legislațiilor - Directivă 89/104/CEE - Articol 2.
Cauza C-283/01.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:641
*A8* Gerechtshof 's-Gravenhage, arrest van 27/05/1999
- European Trade Mark Reports 2000 p.147-167 (*) (Texte anglais)
- Intellectuele eigendom & Reclamerecht 1999 p.173-178 (*)
- Bijblad bij de industriële eigendom 1999 p.248-255 (*)
*A9* Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, vakantiekamer, arrest van 13/07/2001 (C99/288 HR)
- European Current Law 2002 Part 3 nº 51 (résumé) (Texte anglais)
- European Trade Mark Reports 2002 Vol.12 p.1198-1212 (Texte anglais)
- Nederlands juristenblad 2001 p.1383-1385
- Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2001 nº 614
- Rechtspraak van de week 2001 nº 136 (*)
- Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Intellectuele eigendomsrecht : gepubliceerde rechtspraak met annotaties in 2001 en 2002 (Ed. Kluwer - Deventer) 2003 p.270-283
- Brinkhof, J.J.: De Hoge Raad stelt vragen van uitleg aan het Hof van Justitie over klankmerken, Bijblad bij de industriële eigendom 2001 p.252
«(Trade marks – Approximation of laws – Directive 89/104/EEC – Article 2 – Signs of which a trade mark may consist – Signs capable of being represented graphically – Sound signs – Musical notation – Written description – Onomatopoeia)»
|
||||
|
||||
(Council Directive 89/104, Art. 2)
(Council Directive 89/104, Art. 2)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
27 November 2003 (1)
((Trade marks – Approximation of laws – Directive 89/104/EEC – Article 2 – Signs of which a trade mark may consist – Signs capable of being represented graphically – Sound signs – Musical notation – Written description – Onomatopoeia))
In Case C-283/01,
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Shield Mark BVand
Joost Kist h.o.d.n. Memex, on the interpretation of Article 2 of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1),THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of Shield Mark BV, represented by T. Cohen Jehoram, of the Netherlands Government, represented by N.A.J. Bel, acting as Agent, and also of the Commission, represented by N.B. Rasmussen and H. van Vliet, acting as Agent, at the hearing on 27 February 2003,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 3 April 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
in answer to the questions referred to it by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden by judgment of 13 July 2001, hereby rules:
Skouris |
Cunha Rodrigues |
Puissochet |
Schintgen |
Macken |
|
R. Grass |
V. Skouris |
Registrar |
President |