This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Corruption in the private sector
1) OBJECTIVE
To lay down some harmonised definitions in order to combat more effectively corruption in the private sector on an international level, placing particular emphasis on prevention.
2) ACT
Joint Action 98/742/JHA of 22 December 1998 adopted by the Council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on corruption in the private sector [Official Journal L 358, 31.12.1998].
3) SUMMARY
In the context of the development of an overall corruption-prevention policy as provided for in the Action Plan to combat organised crime of 28 April 1997, the Joint Action sets down some common definitions for the policy of combating corruption in the private sector at Member State level (Article 1):
The deliberate action of a person who, in the course of his business activities, directly or through an intermediary, requests or receives an undue advantage of any kind whatsoever, or accepts the promise of such an advantage, for himself or for a third party, for him to perform or refrain from performing an act, in breach of his duties, constitutes passive corruption in the private sector (Article 2).
The deliberate action of whosoever promises, offers or gives, directly or through an intermediary, an undue advantage of any kind whatsoever to a person, for himself or for a third party, in the course of the business activities of that person in order that the person should perform or refrain from performing an act, in breach of his duties, constitutes active corruption in the private sector (Article 3).
Active and passive corruption must be made criminal offences at least where they involve, or could involve, the distortion of competition within the common market or where they result, or might result, in economic damage to others by the improper award or improper execution of a contract.
Each Member State must take the necessary measures to ensure that active and passive corruption, and the acting as an accessory in or instigator of corruption, are punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties, including, at least in serious cases, penalties involving deprivation of liberty which can give rise to extradition (Article 4). However, for minor cases, Member States may provide for penalties of a different kind.
Each Member State must take the necessary measures to ensure that legal persons can be held liable for active corruption committed for their benefit by any person, acting either individually or as part of an organ of the legal person, who has a leading position within the legal person, based on:
Member States must also ensure that a legal person can be held liable where lack of supervision or control has made possible the commission of an act of active corruption by a person as described above for the benefit of the legal person.
Each Member State must take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person held liable is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, including criminal or non-criminal fines and possibly other penalties such as:
Each Member State must take the necessary measures to establish its jurisdiction with regard to the active and passive corruption in the private sector where an offence has been committed:
Member States may choose to apply or not the last two jurisdiction rules.
Act |
Date of entry into force |
Deadline for implementation in the Member States |
Joint Action 98/742/JHA |
31.12.1998 |
31.12.2000 |
4) implementing measures
5) follow-up work
In July 2002 Denmark presented an initiative aimed at drawing up a common definition of active and passive corruption and the applicable penalties. This initiative follows on from the statement by the Council on the occasion of the adoption of Joint Action 98/742/JHA to the effect that other measures to combat corruption in the private sector would be adopted in the light of the outcome of the assessment provided for in Article 8(2) of the Joint Action.
Once the framework decision has been adopted, Joint Action 98/742/JHA will be repealed.
Last updated: 07.09.2005