This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62000CJ0416
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2003. # Tommaso Morellato v Comune di Padova. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunale civile di Padova - Italy. # Articles 30 and 36 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 28 EC and 30 EC - Selling arrangements - National legislation requiring prior packaging and specific labelling for the marketing of deep-frozen bread lawfully produced in a Member State and placed on the market in another Member State after further baking. # Case C-416/00.
Wyrok Trybunału (piąta izba) z dnia 18 września 2003 r.
Tommaso Morellato przeciwko Comune di Padova.
Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym: Tribunale civile di Padova - Włochy.
Sprawa C-416/00.
Wyrok Trybunału (piąta izba) z dnia 18 września 2003 r.
Tommaso Morellato przeciwko Comune di Padova.
Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym: Tribunale civile di Padova - Włochy.
Sprawa C-416/00.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:475
«(Articles 30 and 36 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 28 EC and 30 EC) – Selling arrangements – National legislation requiring prior packaging and specific labelling for the marketing of deep-frozen bread lawfully produced in a Member State and placed on the market in another Member State after further baking)»
|
||||
|
||||
(EC Treaty, Art. 30 (now, after amendment, Art. 28 EC))
(EC Treaty, Arts 30 and 36 (now, after amendment, Arts 28 EC and 30 EC))
(EC Treaty, Art. 30 (now, after amendment, Art. 28 EC))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
18 September 2003 (1)
((Articles 30 and 36 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 28 EC and 30 EC – Selling arrangements – National legislation requiring prior packaging and specific labelling for the marketing of deep-frozen bread lawfully produced in a Member State and placed on the market in another Member State after further baking))
In Case C-416/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Tribunale Civile di Padova (Italy) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Tommaso Morellatoand
Comune di Padova, on the interpretation of Articles 30 and 36 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Articles 28 and 30 EC),THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of the Commission of the European Communities by H. van Lier and R. Amorosi, acting as Agents,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 6 June 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),
in answer to the questions referred to it by the Tribunale Civile di Padova by decision of 16 October 2000, hereby rules:
Timmermans |
Edward |
La Pergola |
Jann |
von Bahr |
|
R. Grass |
M. Wathelet |
Registrar |
President of the Fifth Chamber |