EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52004XX0218(01)
Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/M.2434 — Grupo Villar Mir/ENBW/Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)) (Text with EEA relevance)
Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/M.2434 — Grupo Villar Mir/ENBW/Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)) (Text with EEA relevance)
Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/M.2434 — Grupo Villar Mir/ENBW/Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)) (Text with EEA relevance)
Dz.U. C 42 z 18.2.2004, p. 10–10
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)
Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/M.2434 — Grupo Villar Mir/ENBW/Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)) (Text with EEA relevance)
Official Journal C 042 , 18/02/2004 P. 0010 - 0010
Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/M.2434 - Grupo Villar Mir/ENBW/Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)) (2004/C 42/04) (Text with EEA relevance) The draft decision does not give rise to particular comments on the proceedings which, in their written phase, took a normal course. An Oral Hearing was not requested by the parties. The parties' rights of defence were fully respected. The same is true of RTE's right to be heard as an intervening third party. The draft decision deals only with objections in respect of which the parties have been afforded the opportunity of making known their views. Done at Brussels, 5 September 2001. Helmuth Schröter