This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0076
Judgment of the Court of 30 September 2003. # Comité des industries du coton et des fibres connexes de l'Union européenne (Eurocoton) and Others v Council of the European Union. # Appeal - Dumping - Failure by the Council to adopt a proposal for a regulation imposing definitive anti-dumping duties - Lack of simple majority necessary for the adoption of the regulation - Expiry of the time-limit for the anti-dumping investigation - Definition of a reviewable act - Obligation to state reasons. # Case C-76/01 P.
Wyrok Trybunału z dnia 30 września 2003 r.
Comité des industries du coton et des fibres connexes de l'Union européenne (Eurocoton) i inni przeciwko Radzie Unii Europejskiej.
Odwołanie.
Sprawa C-76/01 P.
Wyrok Trybunału z dnia 30 września 2003 r.
Comité des industries du coton et des fibres connexes de l'Union européenne (Eurocoton) i inni przeciwko Radzie Unii Europejskiej.
Odwołanie.
Sprawa C-76/01 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:511
«(Appeal – Dumping – Failure by the Council to adopt a proposal for a regulation imposing definitive anti-dumping duties – Lack of simple majority necessary for the adoption of the regulation – Expiry of the time-limit for the anti-dumping investigation – Definition of a reviewable act – Obligation to state reasons)»
|
||||
|
||||
(EC Treaty, Art. 168a (now Art. 225 EC); EC Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 51, para. 1; Rules of Procedure of the Court,
Art. 112(1), first subpara., (c))
(EC Treaty, Art. 173 (now, after amendment, Art. 230 EC); Council Regulation No 384/96, Art. 6(9))
(EC Treaty, Art. 173 (now, after amendment, Art. 230 EC))
(EC Treaty, Art. 173, fourth para. (now, after amendment, Art. 230, fourth para., EC))
(EC Treaty, Art. 190 (now Art. 253 EC); Council Regulation No 384/96, Arts 9(4) and 21)
(EC Treaty, Arts 190 and 215, second para. (now Arts 253 and 288, second para., EC))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
30 September 2003 (1)
((Appeal – Dumping – Failure by the Council to adopt a proposal for a regulation imposing definitive anti-dumping duties – Lack of simple majority necessary for the adoption of the regulation – Expiry of the time-limit for the anti-dumping investigation – Definition of a reviewable act – Obligation to state reasons))
In Case C-76/01 P, Committee of the Cotton Allied Textile Industries of the European Union (Eurocoton), established in Brussels (Belgium),Ettlin Gesellschaft für Spinnerei und Weberei AG, established in Ettlingen (Germany),Textil Hof Weberei GmbH & Co. KG, established in Hof (Germany),H. Hecking Söhne GmbH & Co., established in Stadtlohn (Germany),Spinnweberei Uhingen GmbH, established in Uhingen (Germany),F.A. Kümpers Gmbh & Co., established in Rheine (Germany),Tenthorey SA, established in Éloyes (France),Les tissages des héritiers de G. Perrin ─ Groupe Alain Thirion (HPG-GAT Tissages), established in Cornimont (France),Établissements des fils de Victor Perrin SARL, established in Thiéfosse (France),Filatures & tissages de Saulxures-sur-Moselotte, established in Saulxures-sur-Moselotte (France),Tissage Mouline Thillot, established in Thillot (France),Filature Niggeler & Küpfer SpA, established in Capriolo (Italy),Standardtela SpA, established in Milan (Italy),represented by C. Stanbrook and P. Bentley QC, with an address for service in Luxembourg,appellants,
APPEAL against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 November 2002 in Case T-213/97 Eurocoton and Others v Council [2000] ECR II-3727, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other parties to the proceedings being: Council of the European Union, represented by S. Marquardt, acting as Agent, and by G.M. Berrisch and H.P. Nehl, Rechtsanwälte,defendant at first instance, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by K. Manji, acting as Agent,intervener at first instance, andTessival SpA, established in Azzano S. Paolo (Italy),applicant at first instance,THE COURT,,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing oral argument from the appellants and the Council of the European Union at the hearing on 22 October 2002,after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 16 January 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT
hereby:
Rodríguez Iglesias |
Wathelet |
Timmermans |
Gulmann |
Edward |
Jann |
Macken |
Colneric |
von Bahr |
Cunha Rodrigues |
Rosas |
|
R. Grass |
G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias |
Registrar |
President |