Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/261/11

    Case C-287/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 3 July 2006 — Deutsche Post AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Third party: Marketing Service Magdeburg GmbH

    ĠU C 261, 28.10.2006, p. 7–7 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.10.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 261/7


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 3 July 2006 — Deutsche Post AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Third party: Marketing Service Magdeburg GmbH

    (Case C-287/06)

    (2006/C 261/11)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Verwaltungsgericht Köln

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Deutsche Post AG

    Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    Third party: Marketing Service Magdeburg GmbH

    Question referred

    Is Article 47(2), in conjunction with Article 95 EC, the fifth indent of Article 12, and Article 7(1) of Directive 97/67/EC, in the version as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), to be interpreted as meaning that, where a universal service provider applies special tariffs for business customers who give postal items to the sorting office pre-sorted for the postal network, that universal service provider is obliged to apply those special tariffs also to undertakings which collect postal items from the sender and give them pre-sorted for the postal network at the same access point and on the same terms and conditions as business customers, without the universal service provider being permitted to refuse to do so, having regard to its obligation to provide a universal service?


    (1)  OJ 2002 L 176, p. 21.


    Top