This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/096/32
Case T-40/06: Action brought on 9 February 2006 — Trioplast Industrier v Commission
Case T-40/06: Action brought on 9 February 2006 — Trioplast Industrier v Commission
Case T-40/06: Action brought on 9 February 2006 — Trioplast Industrier v Commission
ĠU C 96, 22.4.2006, p. 17–17
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.4.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 96/17 |
Action brought on 9 February 2006 — Trioplast Industrier v Commission
(Case T-40/06)
(2006/C 96/32)
Language of the case: Swedish
Parties
Applicant: Trioplast Industrier AB (Smålandsstenar, Sweden) (represented by: Tommy Pettersson, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
partially annul Article 1(g) of the decision in relation to the period during which the applicant is held liable for the infringement; |
|
— |
partially annul Article 2(f) of the decision in relation to the fine imposed which the applicant is jointly liable to pay; in the alternative, reduce the fine; |
|
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical to those relied on in Case T-26/06 Trioplast Wittenheim v Commission.