This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/171/34
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 May 2005 in Case T-22/04: Reemark Gesellschaft für Markenkooperation mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community Trade Mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Westlife — Earlier national mark West — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 May 2005 in Case T-22/04: Reemark Gesellschaft für Markenkooperation mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community Trade Mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Westlife — Earlier national mark West — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 May 2005 in Case T-22/04: Reemark Gesellschaft für Markenkooperation mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community Trade Mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Westlife — Earlier national mark West — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs)
ĠU C 171, 9.7.2005, p. 19–19
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.7.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/19 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 4 May 2005
in Case T-22/04: Reemark Gesellschaft für Markenkooperation mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
(Community Trade Mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Westlife - Earlier national mark West - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs)
(2005/C 171/34)
Language of the case: English
In Case T-22/04: Reemark Gesellschaft für Markenkooperation mbH, established in Hamburg (Germany), represented by P. Koch Moreno, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: S. Laitinen), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Bluenet Ltd, established in Limerick (Ireland) — application for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 November 2003 (Case R 238/2002-2) relating to opposition proceedings brought by the holder of the mark West against the application for the mark Westlife — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; B. Pastor, Assistant Registrar, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 4 May 2005, in which it:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 17 November 2003 (Case R 238/2002-2); |
|
2. |
Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by the applicant. |