This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2003/044/10
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 January 2003 in Case C-292/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof): Davidoff & Cie SA, Zino Davidoff SA v Gofkid Ltd (Directive 89/104/EEC — Articles 4(4)(a) and 5(2) — Well-known trade marks — Protection against use of a sign in respect of identical or similar products or services)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 January 2003 in Case C-292/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof): Davidoff & Cie SA, Zino Davidoff SA v Gofkid Ltd (Directive 89/104/EEC — Articles 4(4)(a) and 5(2) — Well-known trade marks — Protection against use of a sign in respect of identical or similar products or services)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 January 2003 in Case C-292/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof): Davidoff & Cie SA, Zino Davidoff SA v Gofkid Ltd (Directive 89/104/EEC — Articles 4(4)(a) and 5(2) — Well-known trade marks — Protection against use of a sign in respect of identical or similar products or services)
ĠU C 44, 22.2.2003, pp. 6–6
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)