Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/095/05

Case C-354/04 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2007 — Gestoras Pro Amnistía, Juan Mari Olano Olano, Julen Zelarain Errasti v Council of the European Union, Kingdom of Spain, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Appeal — European Union — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Common Positions 2001/931/CFSP, 2002/340/CFSP and 2002/462/CFSP — Measures concerning persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts — Action for damages — Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice)

ĠU C 95, 28.4.2007, p. 4–4 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.4.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/4


Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2007 — Gestoras Pro Amnistía, Juan Mari Olano Olano, Julen Zelarain Errasti v Council of the European Union, Kingdom of Spain, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-354/04 P) (1)

(Appeal - European Union - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Common Positions 2001/931/CFSP, 2002/340/CFSP and 2002/462/CFSP - Measures concerning persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts - Action for damages - Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice)

(2007/C 95/05)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Gestoras Pro Amnistía, Juan Mari Olano Olano, Julen Zelarain Errasti, (represented by: D. Rouget, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Finnegan and M. Bauer, Agents), Kingdom of Spain, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Second Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 7 June 2004 in Case T-332/02 Gestoras Pro Amnistía and Others v Council of the European Union [2004], not published in the ECR, dismissing the applicants' action seeking damages in respect of the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the inclusion of Gestoras Pro Amnistía in the list drawn up under the legislation on the fight against terrorism.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

2.

Orders Gestoras Pro-Amnistía, Mr. Olano Olano and Mr. Zelarain Errasti to pay the costs.

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 251, 9.10.2004.


Top