This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 92002E000251
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0251/02 by Brigitte Langenhagen (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Treatment of fish with water-binding substances to increase their total weight.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0251/02 by Brigitte Langenhagen (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Treatment of fish with water-binding substances to increase their total weight.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0251/02 by Brigitte Langenhagen (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Treatment of fish with water-binding substances to increase their total weight.
OV C 147E, 20.6.2002, p. 245–245
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0251/02 by Brigitte Langenhagen (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Treatment of fish with water-binding substances to increase their total weight.
Official Journal 147 E , 20/06/2002 P. 0245 - 0245
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0251/02 by Brigitte Langenhagen (PPE-DE) to the Commission (6 February 2002) Subject: Treatment of fish with water-binding substances to increase their total weight There have been reports in the German specialist press about a method of processing fish and fish products which misleads consumers. Products are said to be in use in the Netherlands which bind excess water, thus artificially increasing the weight of the final product. These substances, known collectively as Tari, are allegedly used in both fillets and whole fish. The active ingredients are said to be proteins, so that the European ban on the use of phosphates does not apply. The proteins added are not listed on the label of the final product, in violation of the relevant legislation. The consumer suffers because the 5-15 % weight gain, which is reflected in the price of the product, is entirely lost when the fish is cooked. Furthermore, the consumer is not informed that the substances have been added. As well as this, the parts of the industry which do not use these unfair methods are affected by the competitive disadvantage they suffer. 1. Is the Commission aware of fish being treated in this way, in the Netherlands or elsewhere? 2. What can be done to prevent this practice, which is prejudicial to the interests of consumers and honest producers alike? Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission (6 March 2002) The Commission has asked the Member State concerned for information regarding the facts raised to by the Honourable Member. It will inform her of its findings.