EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
Document C:2002:003:TOC
Official Journal of the European Communities, C 3, 05 January 2002
Official Journal of the European Communities, C 3, 05 January 2002
Official Journal of the European Communities, C 3, 05 January 2002
Display all documents published in this Official Journal
Language
PDF
| Official Journal of the European Communities | ISSN
0378-6986 C 3 Volume 45 5 January 2002 |
| English edition | Information and Notices | ||
| Notice No | Contents | Page | |
| I Information | |||
| Court of Justice | |||
| COURT OF JUSTICE | |||
| 2002/C 3/01 | Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 October 2001 in Joined Cases C-49/98, C-50/98, C52/98 to C-54/98 and C-68/98 to C-71/98 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Wiesbaden): Finalarte Sociedade de Construção Civil Ld.a v Urlaubs- und Lohnausgleichskasse der Bauwirtschaft, Urlaubs- und Lohnausgleichskasse der Bauwirtschaft v Amilcar Oliveira Rocha and Others, Portugaia Construções Ld.a v Urlaubs- und Lohnausgleichskasse der Bauwirtschaft, Engil Sociedade de Construção Civil SA v Urlaubs- und Lohnausgleichskasse der Bauwirtschaft (Freedom to provide services — Temporary deployment of workers for the purposes of performing a contract — Paid leave and holiday pay) | 1 | |
| 2002/C 3/02 | Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2001 in Case C-263/98: Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (EAGGF — Clearance of accounts — 1994 — Cereals, beef and veal) | 2 | |
| 2002/C 3/03 | Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2001 in Case C-277/98: French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (EAGGF — Clearance of accounts — 1994 — Supplementary levy on milk — Disputes between those liable to the levy and the competent national authorities — Proceedings before national courts — Negative corrections applied to Member States for supplementary levies not yet recovered) | 3 | |
| 2002/C 3/04 | Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2001 in Case C-338/98: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Articles 17(2)(a) and 18(1)(a) of the Sixth VAT Directive — National legislation allowing an employer to deduct, as input tax, a certain percentage of an allowance paid to an employee for business use of a private vehicle) | 3 | |
| 2002/C 3/05 | Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 October 2001 in Case C-398/98: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Article 30 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 28 EC) — Obligation to maintain minimum stocks of petroleum products) | 4 | |
| 2002/C 3/06 | Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 November 2001 in Case C-59/99: Commission of the European Communities v Manuel Pereira Roldão & Filhos Ld.a, Instituto Superior Técnico and King, Taudevin & Gregson (Holdings) Ltd (Arbitration clause — Reimbursement of advance payments made under a contract terminated by the Commission for non-performance) | 4 | |
| 2002/C 3/07 | Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 November 2001 in Case C-127/99: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Inadequate implementation of Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources) | 5 | |
| 2002/C 3/08 | Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2001 in Case C-143/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verfassungsgerichtshof): Adria-Wien Pipeline GmbH, and Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke GmbH v Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten (Tax on energy — Rebate granted only to undertakings manufacturing goods — State aid) | 6 | |
| 2002/C 3/09 | Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 November 2001 in Case C-228/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile e penale di Cagliari): Silos e Mangimi Martini SpA v Ministero delle Finanze (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Export refunds — Withdrawal — Interpretation and validity of Regulations (EC) Nos 1521/95 and 1576/95 — Failure to state reasons) | 6 | |
| 2002/C 3/10 | Judgment of the Court of 27 September 2001 in Case C-235/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court)): The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte: Eleonora Ivanova Kondova (External relations — Association Agreement between the Communities and Bulgaria — Freedom of establishment — Leave to enter fraudulently obtained — Obligation on a Member State to pay compensation for damage caused to an individual invoking a right of establishment which is directly effective under the Association Agreement) | 7 | |
| 2002/C 3/11 | Judgment of the Court of 20 November 2001 in Case C-268/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arrondissementsrechtbank te 's-Gravenhage): Aldona Malgorzata Jany and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (External relations — Association agreements between the Communities and Poland and between the Communities and the Czech Republic — Freedom of establishment — "Economic activities" — Whether or not they include the activity of prostitution) | 8 | |
| 2002/C 3/12 | Judgment of the Court of 20 September 2001 in Case C-383/99 P: Procter & Gamble Company v Office, for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Appeal — Admissibility — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Absolute ground for refusal to register — Distinctive character — Marks consisting exclusively of descriptive signs or indications — "BABY-DRY") | 9 | |
| 2002/C 3/13 | Judgment of the Court of 20 November 2001 in Joined Cases C-414/99 to C-416/99 [reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division (Patent Court)]: Zino Davidoff SA and A & G Imports Ltd (C-414/99), between Levi Strauss & Co., Levi Strauss (UK) Ltd and Tesco Stores Ltd, Tesco plc (C-415/99), and between Levi Strauss & Co., Levi Strauss (UK) Ltd v Costco Wholesale UK Ltd (Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 7(1) — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Goods placed on the market outside the EEA — Imported into the EEA — Consent of the trade mark proprietor — Whether consent required to be express or implied — Law governing the contract Presumption of consent — Non-applicability) | 10 | |
| 2002/C 3/14 | Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2001 in Case C-442/99 P: Cordis Obst und Gemüse Grosshandel GmbH (Appeal — Common organisation of the market — Bananas — Imports from ACP States and third countries — Request for import licences — Transitional measures — Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 — Principle of equal treatment) | 11 | |
| 2002/C 3/15 | Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 November 2001 in Case C-427/00: Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Quality of bathing water — Inadequate compliance with Directive 76/160/EEC) | 11 | |
| 2002/C 3/16 | Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 October 2001 in Case C-241/00 P: Kish Glass Co. Ltd v Commission of the European Communities and Pilkington United Kingdom Ltd (Appeal — Competition — Dominant position — Market in float glass — Rights of the complainant — Appeal manifestly unfounded) | 12 | |
| 2002/C 3/17 | Cases C-339/01, C-343/01 and C-357/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat of the Land Vorarlberg by orders of 4 September 2001, 10 September 2001 and 11 September 2001 in the appeals brought by Kurt Beck, Christian Kröll and Manfred Laaber | 12 | |
| 2002/C 3/18 | Case C-363/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Oberlandesgericht, Frankfurt am Main, by order of that court of 10 July 2001 in the case of Flughafen Hannover-Langenhagen GmbH v Deutsche Lufthansa AG | 13 | |
| 2002/C 3/19 | Case C-379/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesvergabeamt (Austria) by order of 12 September 2001 in the case of Ortner Gesellschaft m.b.H. v Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt | 14 | |
| 2002/C 3/20 | Cases C-395/01 and C-417/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat of the Land Vorarlberg by orders of 8 October 2001 and 17 October 2001 in the appeals brought by Herbert Bregenzer | 14 | |
| 2002/C 3/21 | Cases C-397/01 to C-403/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Arbeitsgericht Lörrach by orders of 26 September 2001 in the cases of Bernhard Pfeiffer, Wilhelm Roith, Albert Süss, Michael Winter, Klaus Nestvogel, Roswitha Zeller and Matthias Döbele v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut e.V. | 15 | |
| 2002/C 3/22 | Case C-408/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden by judgment of that court of 12 October 2001 in the case of 1. ADIDAS A.G. and 2. ADIDAS BENELUX B.V. against FITNESS WORLD TRADING Ltd | 15 | |
| 2002/C 3/23 | Case C-418/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main by order of that court of 12 July 2001 in the case of IMS Health GmbH & Co. OHG v NDC Health GmbH & Co | 16 | |
| 2002/C 3/24 | Case C-421/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesvergabeamt (Austria) by order of 25 September 2001 in the case of Traunfellner GmbH v Österreichische Autobahnen- und Schnellstrassen-Finanzierungs-AG (ÖSAG) | 16 | |
| 2002/C 3/25 | Case C-423/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Verwaltungsgericht Neustadt an der Weinstrasse by order of that court of 30 July 2001 in the case of Emil Färber GmbH & Co. v Stadt Neustadt/Weinstrasse | 17 | |
| 2002/C 3/26 | Case C-424/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesvergabeamt (Austria) by order of 25 October 2001 in the case of CS Communications & Systems Austria GmbH v Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt | 17 | |
| 2002/C 3/27 | Case C-426/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunal d'Instance, Vienne, by judgment of that court of 19 October 2001 in the case of SA Société ACCEA Finances v Christian Giner | 18 | |
| 2002/C 3/28 | Case C-427/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundessozialgericht by order of that court of 2 August 2001 in the case of Dülger Trans Uluslararasi Tazimacilik Ltd. Sti v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit | 18 | |
| 2002/C 3/29 | Case C-428/01: Reference. for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Catania — 4th Civil Section — by order of 15 October 2001 in the case of Costanzo SpA v Elettrica SpA | 19 | |
| 2002/C 3/30 | Case C-431/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Cour d'appel de Mons (6ème chambre fiscale) by judgment of 2 November 2001 in the case of Philippe Mertens against État belge | 19 | |
| 2002/C 3/31 | Case C-432/01: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat of the Land Vorarlberg by order of 29 October 2001 in the appeal brought by Helmut Gunz | 20 | |
| COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE | |||
| 2002/C 3/32 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 July 2001 in Joined Cases T-202/98, T-204/98 and T-207/98: Tate & Lyle plc and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Competition — Sugar market — Infringement of Article 85 of the EC Treaty (now Article 81 EC) — Fines) | 21 | |
| 2002/C 3/33 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 July 2001 in Case T-2/99: T. Port GmbH & Co. KG v Council of the European Union (Bananas — Imports from ACP States and third countries — Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 — Possibility of relying on WTO rules — First paragraph of Article 234 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, first paragraph of Article 307 EC) — Action for damages) | 21 | |
| 2002/C 3/34 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 July 2001 in Case T-3/99: Banatrading GmbH v Council of the European Union (Bananas — Imports from ACP States and third countries — Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 — Possibility of relying on WTO rules — First paragraph of Article 234 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, first paragraph of Article 307 EC) — Action for damages) | 22 | |
| 2002/C 3/35 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 June 2001 in Case T-6/99: ESF Elbe-Stahlwerke Feralpi GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (ECSC Treaty — State aid — Investment aid — Operating aid — Scope of the ECSC Treaty — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations) | 22 | |
| 2002/C 3/36 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-58/99: Mukand Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (Anti-subsidy proceedings — Regulation (EC) No 2450/98 — Stainless steel bright bars — Injury — Causal link) | 23 | |
| 2002/C 3/37 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October 2001 in Case T-171/99: Corus UK Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Action for damages — Recovery of undue payments — Harm suffered by reason of a partially annulled decision) | 23 | |
| 2002/C 3/38 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 June 2001 in Case T-188/99: Euroalliages v Commission of the European Communities (Dumping — Decision terminating an expiry review — Action for annulment) | 24 | |
| 2002/C 3/39 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-337/99: Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 24 | |
| 2002/C 3/40 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2001 in Case T-344/99: Lucía Recalde Langarica v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of the Staff Regulations — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Rights of defence) | 24 | |
| 2002/C 3/41 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-26/00: Lecureur S.A. v Commission of the European Communities (Commission Regulation No 2519/97 — Food aid — Arbitration clause — Contractual nature of the dispute — Non-conformity of the goods delivered — Thefts from warehouses — Transfer of the burden of risk — Deductions from payments) | 25 | |
| 2002/C 3/42 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-30/00: Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Tablet for washing machines or dishwashers — Figurative mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 25 | |
| 2002/C 3/43 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October 2001 in Case T-111/00: British American Tobacco International (Investments) Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Decision 94/90/ECSC, EC, Euratom — Public access to Commission documents — Minutes of the Committee on Excise Duties — Partial access — Exception — Identities of national delegations — Protection of an institution's interest in the confidentiality of its proceedings) | 26 | |
| 2002/C 3/44 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-117/00: Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 26 | |
| 2002/C 3/45 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-118/00: Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 27 | |
| 2002/C 3/46 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-119/00: Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 27 | |
| 2002/C 3/47 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-120/00: Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 28 | |
| 2002/C 3/48 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-121/00: Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 28 | |
| 2002/C 3/49 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-128/00: Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 29 | |
| 2002/C 3/50 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-129/00: Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 29 | |
| 2002/C 3/51 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 October 2001 in Case T-140/00: Zapf Creation AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — "New Born Baby" — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94) | 30 | |
| 2002/C 3/52 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-152/00: E v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Candidacy rejected — Infringement of the vacancy notice — Manifest error of assessment — Discrimination — Misuse of powers) | 30 | |
| 2002/C 3/53 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2001 in Case T-171/00: Peter Spruyt v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Protection against the risk of accident and of occupational disease — Entitlement to benefits provided for under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Hang-gliding accident) | 31 | |
| 2002/C 3/54 | Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2001 in Case T-95/01: Gérald Coget and Others v Court of Auditors of the European Communities (Officials — Post of Secretary General — Appeal for candidacies — "High level" experience — Wide measure of discretion of the institution — Call to interview) | 31 | |
| 2002/C 3/55 | Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 July 2001 in Case T-191/00: Werner F. Edlinger v Commission of the European Communities (Action for failure to act — Actionable omissions — Inadmissibility) | 32 | |
| 2002/C 3/56 | Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2001 in Case T-132/01 R: Euroalliages and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Application for interim measures — Article 108 of the Rules of Procedure) | 32 | |
| 2002/C 3/57 | Action brought on 20 September 2001 by Japan Tobacco Inc. and JT International S.A. against the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament (Case T-223/01) | 32 | |
| 2002/C 3/58 | Case T-224/01: Action brought on 24 September 2001 by Houghton Durferrit GmbH against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market | 33 | |
| 2002/C 3/59 | Case T-239/01: Action brought on 2 October 2001 by SGL Carbon AG against the Commission of the European Communities | 34 | |
| 2002/C 3/60 | Case T-242/01: Action brought on 3 October 2001 by Rica Foods (Free Zone) N.V. against the Commission of the European Communities | 34 | |
| 2002/C 3/61 | Case T-243/01: Action brought on 3 October 2001 by SONY Computer Entertainment Europe Limited against the Commission of the European Communities | 35 | |
| 2002/C 3/62 | Case T-249/01: Action brought on 9 October 2001 by Marc Boixader Rivas against European Parliament | 36 | |
| 2002/C 3/63 | Case T-250/01: Action brought on 10 October 2001 by Dresdner Bank AG against Commission of the European Communities | 36 | |
| 2002/C 3/64 | Case T-254/01: Action brought on 9 October 2001 by Giuseppe Di Pietro against Court of Auditors of the European Communities | 37 | |
| 2002/C 3/65 | Case T-255/01: Action brought on 11 October 2001 by Changzhou Hailong Electronics & Light Fixtures Co., Ltd. & Zhejiang Yankon Group Co., Ltd. against the Council of the European Union | 37 | |
| 2002/C 3/66 | Case T-257/01: Action brought on 8 October 2001 by Frosch Touristik GmbH against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 38 | |
| 2002/C 3/67 | Case T-260/01: Action brought on 15 October 2001 by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco International, Inc, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and RJR Acquisition Corp. against the Commission of the European Communities | 39 | |
| 2002/C 3/68 | Case T-262/01: Action brought on 19 October 2001 by Jürgen Sachau against the Commission of the European Communities | 40 | |
| 2002/C 3/69 | Case T-263/01: Action brought on 17 October 2001 by Petros Mavromikhalis against the Commission of the European Communities | 40 | |
| 2002/C 3/70 | Case T-265/01: Action brought on 22 October 2001 by Confederación Empresarial Vasca against Commission of the European Communities | 41 | |
| 2002/C 3/71 | Case T-266/01: Action brought on 22 October 2001 by Confederación Empresarial Vasca against Commission of the European Communities | 41 | |
| 2002/C 3/72 | Case T-267/01: Action brought on 22 October 2001 by Confederación Empresarial Vasca against Commission of the European Communities | 42 | |
| 2002/C 3/73 | Case T-268/01: Action brought on 22 October 2001 by Confederación Empresarial Vasca against Commission of the European Communities | 42 | |
| 2002/C 3/74 | Case T-269/01: Action brought on 22 October 2001 by Confederación Empresarial Vasca against Commission of the European Communities | 43 | |
| 2002/C 3/75 | Case T-270/01: Action brought on 22 October 2001 by Confederación Empresarial Vasca against Commission of the European Communities | 43 | |
| 2002/C 3/76 | Case T-271/01: Action brought on 23 October 2001 by José Manuel López Cejudo against Commission of the European Communities | 44 | |
| 2002/C 3/77 | Case T-272/01: Action brought on 15 October 2001 by Philip Morris International Inc. against the Commission of the European Communities | 45 | |
| 2002/C 3/78 | Case T-273/01: Action brought on 22 October 2001 by Innova Privat-Akademie GmbH against the Commission of the European Communities | 45 | |
| 2002/C 3/79 | Case T-274/01: Action brought on 22 October 2001 by Valmont Nederland B.V. against the Commission of the European Communities | 46 | |
| 2002/C 3/80 | Case T-275/01: Action brought on 26 October 2001 by Mercedes Alvarez Moreno against European Parliament | 46 | |
| 2002/C 3/81 | Case T-276/01: Action brought on 26 October 2001 by Mély Garroni against European Parliament | 47 | |
| 2002/C 3/82 | Case T-277/01: Action brought on 26 October 2001 by Romuald Stevens against Commission of the European Communities | 47 | |
| 2002/C 3/83 | Case T-278/01: Action brought on 26 October 2001 by Eric den Hamer against Commission of the European Communities | 48 | |
| 2002/C 3/84 | Case T-279/01: Action brought on 5 November 2001 by Giorgio Lebedef against Commission of the European Communities | 48 | |
| 2002/C 3/85 | Case T-281/01: Action brought on 8 November 2001 by Hubert Huygens against Commission of the European Communities | 49 | |
| 2002/C 3/86 | Removal from the Register of Case T-247/99 | 50 | |
| 2002/C 3/87 | Removal from the Register of Case T-167/00 | 50 | |
| 2002/C 3/88 | Removal from the Register of Case T-192/00 | 50 | |
| 2002/C 3/89 | Removal from the Register of Case T-225/00 | 50 | |
| 2002/C 3/90 | Removal from the Register of Case T-55/01 | 50 | |
| 2002/C 3/91 | Removal from the Register of Case T-112/01 | 50 | |
| EN | |||