Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) 4 March 2002 in Case C-175/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen): Marie-Josée Verwayen-Boelen v Rijksdienst voor Arbeidsvoorziening (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Answer to the question admitting of no reasonable doubt — Article 67(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Aggregation of periods of insurance or employment for the purpose of acquisition of a right to unemployment benefits — Requirement that periods of insurance or employment be completed lastly in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed)

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) 4 March 2002 in Case C-175/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen): Marie-Josée Verwayen-Boelen v Rijksdienst voor Arbeidsvoorziening (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Answer to the question admitting of no reasonable doubt — Article 67(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Aggregation of periods of insurance or employment for the purpose of acquisition of a right to unemployment benefits — Requirement that periods of insurance or employment be completed lastly in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed)

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) 4 March 2002 in Case C-175/00 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen): Marie-Josée Verwayen-Boelen v Rijksdienst voor Arbeidsvoorziening (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Answer to the question admitting of no reasonable doubt — Article 67(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Aggregation of periods of insurance or employment for the purpose of acquisition of a right to unemployment benefits — Requirement that periods of insurance or employment be completed lastly in accordance with the legislation under which the benefits are claimed)

OL C 144, 2002 6 15, p. 11–12 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)