1

By application lodged at the Tribunal Registry on 9 March 2015, FK and six other applicants brought the present action seeking, initially:

2

By letter of 14 July 2015, the Tribunal requested the initial applicants to state their views, pursuant to Article 44(1) and (2) of the Rules of Procedure, on the potential separation of their cases. Those applicants having lodged their observations in that connection on 2 September 2015, the President of the Third Chamber, by order of 16 September 2015 in FK and Others v CEPOL (F‑41/15, EU:F:2015:104), decided to separate the cases of the six other applicants from the case of FK.

3

By letter of 14 July 2015, the Registry also informed the parties of the Tribunal’s decision to apply Article 90(1) of the Rules of Procedure and to instruct the Judge-Rapporteur to seek an amicable settlement of the dispute.

4

In that regard, since FK and CEPOL both, on 2 September 2015, agreed on the proposal for an amicable settlement which had been submitted to them by the Judge-Rapporteur, it is necessary, in accordance with Article 91(1) of the Rules of Procedure, to record the agreement between the parties on the amicable settlement concluded on the initiative of the Tribunal and to remove the present case from the register of the Tribunal.

5

Under Article 91(3) of the Rules of Procedure, where there is an agreement between the parties as to costs, the decision made follows that agreement. The costs are therefore to be borne by each of the parties in accordance with the terms of their agreement.

On those grounds,

THE PRESIDENT OF THE THIRD CHAMBER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

hereby orders: