EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 61979CO0731(01)
Order of the President of the Court of 13 March 1980. # B v European Parliament. # Case 731-79 R II.
1980 m. kovo 13 d. Teisingumo Teismo pirmininko nutartis.
B prieš Europos Parlamentą.
Byla 731-79 R II.
1980 m. kovo 13 d. Teisingumo Teismo pirmininko nutartis.
B prieš Europos Parlamentą.
Byla 731-79 R II.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1980:80
61979O0731(01)
Order of the President of the Court of 13 March 1980. - B v European Parliament. - Case 731-79 R II.
European Court reports 1980 Page 00829
Parties
Subject of the case
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part
Parties
IN CASE 731/79 R II
B ., A MEDICAL PRACTITIONER AND AN OFFICIAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT , RESIDING AT KEHLEN , REPRESENTED BY W . H . VERMEER , OF THE AMSTERDAM BAR , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG C/O DR P . STEIN , 2 AVENUE PESCATORE ,
APPLICANT ,
V
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT , REPRESENTED BY F . PASETTI-BOMBARDELLA , DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF ADMINISTRATION , PERSONNEL AND FINANCE , KIRCHBERG , LUXEMBOURG , ASSISTED BY FRANCIS HERBERT , OF THE BRUSSELS BAR , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE EUROPEAN CENTRE , KIRCHBERG ,
DEFENDANT ,
Subject of the case
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT , PURSUANT TO THE RULES ON THE INSURANCE OF OFFICIALS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES AGAINST THE RISK OF ACCIDENT AND OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE FOR THE SETTING UP OF A MEDICAL BOARD TO ASSESS THE OCCUPATIONAL NATURE OF THE APPLICANT ' S ILLNESS ,
Grounds
THE ABOVE-MENTIONED LETTERS OF 21 AND 31 JANUARY 1980 DO NOT IN ANY WAY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSTANCE AND FORM IMPOSED BY ARTICLE 83 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMISSIBILITY OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF INTERIM MEASURES INTENDED EITHER TO BRING ABOUT THE SUSPENSION OF OPERATION OF A MEASURE OR TO CAUSE THE COURT TO PRESCRIBE INTERIM MEASURES RELATING TO THE MAIN ACTION BEFORE IT .
THE APPLICANT HAS NOT EVEN INDICATED WHETHER IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE FACTS WHICH HE HAS MENTIONED HE HAS APPLIED TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLES 17 TO 21 OF THE RULES ON THE INSURANCE OF OFFICIALS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES AGAINST THE RISK OF ACCIDENT AND OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADOPTING THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE LAID DOWN FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THOSE RULES .
Decision on costs
THE FOREGOING CONSIDERATIONS LEAD TO THE CONCLUSION THAT IN THIS CASE THERE ARE GROUNDS , NOT FOR RESERVING THE COSTS , BUT FOR MAKING AN ORDER FOR COSTS AS PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 70 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED BY AN OFFICIAL .
Operative part
ON THOSE GROUNDS ,
THE JUDGE ACTING AS PRESIDENT
HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :
1 . THE APPLICATION IS DISMISSED .
2 . THE PARTIES SHALL BEAR THEIR OWN COSTS .