EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 61975CJ0048
Sprendimo santrauka
Sprendimo santrauka
1 . FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS - NATIONALS OF MEMBER STATES - RIGHT OF RESIDENCE - INDIVIDUAL RIGHT - RIGHT CONFERRED DIRECTLY BY THE TREATY - SAFEGUARD OF PUBLIC POLICY , PUBLIC SECURITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH - EFFECTS
( EEC TREATY , ARTICLES 48 , 52 , 56 AND 59 )
2 . FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS - NATIONALS OF MEMBER STATES - RESIDENCE PERMIT - ISSUE - MEMBER STATES ' OBLIGATIONS
( DIRECTIVE NO 68/360 , ARTICLE 4 )
3 . FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS - NATIONALS OF MEMBER STATES - ENTRY , MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE - LEGAL FORMALITIES - FAILURE TO COMPLY - CONSEQUENCES
( EEC TREATY , ARTICLES 48 , 52 AND 59 )
4 . FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS - NATIONALS OF MEMBER STATES - EXPULSION - TAKING EFFECT - APPEAL BY THE PARTY CONCERNED - RIGHT - EXERCISE - PREREQUISITE
( DIRECTIVE NO 64/221 , ARTICLES 8 AND 9 )
5 . FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS - NATIONALS OF MEMBER STATES - ESTABLISHMENT - PROVISION OF SERVICES - MEMBER STATES ' OBLIGATIONS - IMPLEMENTING MEASURES - NEW RESTRICTIONS - PROHIBITION
( EEC TREATY , ARTICLES 53 AND 62 )
6 . MEASURES ADOPTED BY AN INSTITUTION - DIRECTIVE - IMPLEMENTATION IN THE NATIONAL SYSTEM - FORMS AND METHODS - CHOICE - EFFECTIVENESS - MEMBER STATES OBLIGATIONS
( EEC TREATY , ARTICLE 189 )
1 . THE RIGHT OF NATIONALS OF A MEMBER STATE TO ENTER THE TERRITORY OF ANOTHER MEMBER STATE AND RESIDE THERE IS A RIGHT CONFERRED DIRECTLY , ON ANY PERSON FALLING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF COM- MUNITY LAW , BY THE TREATY , ESPECIALLY ARTICLES 48 , 52 AND 59 OR WHERE APPROPRIATE , BY THE PROVISIONS ADOPTED1 - LANGUAGE OF THE CASE : FRENCH .
FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION , INDEPENDENTLY OF ANY RESIDENCE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE HOST STATE . THE EXCEPTION CONCERNING THE SAFEGUARD OF PUBLIC POLICY , PUBLIC SECURITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH CONTAINED IN ARTICLES 48 ( 3 ) AND 56 ( 1 ) OF THE TREATY MUST BE REGARDED NOT AS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO THE ACQUISITION OF THE RIGHT OF ENTRY AND RESIDENCE BUT AS PROVIDING THE POSSIBILITY , IN INDIVIDUAL CASES WHERE THERE IS SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION , OF IMPOSING RESTRICTIONS ON THE EXERCISE OF A RIGHT DERIVED DIRECTLY FROM THE TREATY .
2 . ARTICLE 4 OF DIRECTIVE NO 78/360 ENTAILS AN OBLIGATION FOR MEMBER STATES TO ISSUE A RESIDENCE PERMIT TO ANY PERSON WHO PROVIDES PROOF , BY MEANS OF THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS , THAT HE BELONGS TO ONE OF THE CATEGORIES SET OUT IN ARTICLE 1 OF THE DIRECTIVE .
3 . THE MERE FAILURE BY A NATIONAL OF A MEMBER STATE TO COMPLY WITH THE FORMALITIES CONCERNING THE ENTRY , MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE OF ALIENS IS NOT OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO CONSTITUTE IN ITSELF CONDUCT THREATENING PUBLIC POLICY , AND PUBLIC SECURITY AND CANNOT THEREFORE , BY ITSELF , JUSTIFY A MEASURE ORDERING EXPULSION OR TEMPORARY IMPRISONMENT FOR THAT PURPOSE .
4 . A DECISION ORDERING EXPULSION CANNOT BE EXECUTED , SAVE IN CASES OF URGENCY WHICH HAVE BEEN PROPERLY JUSTIFIED , AGAINST A PERSON PROTECTED BY COMMUNITY LAW UNTIL THE PARTY CONCERNED HAS BEEN ABLE TO EXHAUST THE REMEDIES GUARANTEED BY ARTICLES 8 AND 9 OF DIRECTIVE NO 64/221 .
5 . ARTICLES 53 AND 62 OF THE TREATY PROHIBIT THE INTRODUCTION BY A MEMBER STATE OF NEW RESTRICTIONS ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONALS OF OTHER MEMBER STATES AND THE FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES WHICH HAS IN FACT BEEN ATTAINED AND PREVENT THE MEMBER STATES FROM REVERTING TO LESS LIBERAL PROVISIONS OR PRACTICES IN SO FAR AS THE LIBERALIZATION MEASURES ALREADY ADOPTED CONSTITUTE THE IMPLEMEN- TATION OF OBLIGATIONS ARISING FROM THE PROVISIONS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE TREATY .
6 . THE FREEDOM LEFT TO THE MEMBER STATES BY ARTICLE 189 AS TO THE CHOICE OF FORMS AND METHODS OF IMPLEMEN- TATION OF DIRECTIVES DOES NOT AFFECT THEIR OBLIGATION TO CHOOSE THE MOST APPROPRIATE FORMS AND METHODS TO ENSURE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE DIRECTIVES .