This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0122
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2003. # T. Port GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities. # Appeal - Bananas - Common organisation of the markets - Regulation (EC) No 478/95 - Export licence scheme - Action for damages - Proof of damage and causal link. # Case C-122/01 P.
2003 m. gegužės 8 d. Teisingumo Teismo (šeštoji kolegija) sprendimas.
T. Port GmbH & Co. KG prieš Europos Bendrijų Komisiją.
Apeliacinis skundas - Bendras rinkų organizavimas - Ieškinys dėl žalos atlyginimo.
Byla C-122/01 P.
2003 m. gegužės 8 d. Teisingumo Teismo (šeštoji kolegija) sprendimas.
T. Port GmbH & Co. KG prieš Europos Bendrijų Komisiją.
Apeliacinis skundas - Bendras rinkų organizavimas - Ieškinys dėl žalos atlyginimo.
Byla C-122/01 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:259
«(Appeal – Bananas – Common organisation of the markets – Regulation (EC) No 478/95 – Export licence scheme – Action for damages – Proof of damage and causal link)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first subpara.)
(Art. 225(1) EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first subpara.)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
8 May 2003 (1)
((Appeal – Bananas – Common organisation of the markets – Regulation (EC) No 478/95 – Export licence scheme – Action for damages – Proof of damage and causal link))
In Case C-122/01 P, T. Port GmbH & Co. KG, established in Hamburg (Germany), represented by G. Meier, Rechtsanwalt,appellant,
APPEAL against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fifth Chamber) of 1 February 2001 in Case T-1/99 T. Port v Commission [2001] ECR II-465, seeking to have that judgment set aside in part, the other party to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities, represented by K.-D. Borchardt and M. Niejahr, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,defendant at first instance,THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing oral argument from the parties at the hearing on 4 July 2002,after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 24 October 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
hereby:
Puissochet |
Schintgen |
Skouris |
Macken |
Colneric |
|
R. Grass |
J.-P. Puissochet |
Registrar |
President of the Sixth Chamber |