Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018CO0471(02)

Rectification order of 4 March 2021.
Federal Republic of Germany v European Chemicals Agency.
Rectification of judgment.
Case C-471/18 P.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:179

 ORDER OF THE COURT (Third Chamber)

4 March 2021 ( *1 )

(Rectification of judgment)

In Case C‑471/18 P-REC,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 18 July 2018,

Federal Republic of Germany, represented initially by T. Henze and D. Klebs, and subsequently by D. Klebs and J. Möller, acting as Agents,

appellant

the other parties to the proceedings being:

Esso Raffinage, established in Courbevoie (France), represented initially by H. Estreicher, Rechtsanwalt, and N. Navin-Jones, Solicitor, subsequently by H. Estreicher, Rechtsanwalt, A. Kołtunowska, adwokat, K. Merten-Lentz, avocate, and N. Navin-Jones, Solicitor, and finally by H. Estreicher, Rechtsanwalt, A. Kołtunowska, adwokat, and K. Merten-Lentz, avocate,

applicant at first instance,

European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), represented by W. Broere, C. Jacquet and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents,

defendant at first instance,

French Republic, represented initially by D. Colas, J. Traband and A.‑L. Desjonquères, and subsequently by E. Leclerc, J. Traband, W. Zemamta and A.-L. Desjonquères, acting as Agents,

Kingdom of the Netherlands, represented by M.K. Bulterman and M.L. Noort, acting as Agents,

interveners at first instance,

European Coalition to End Animal Experiments, established in London (United Kingdom), represented by D. Thomas, Solicitor,

Higher Olefins and Poly Alpha Olefins REACH Consortium, established in Brussels (Belgium),

Higher Olefins & Poly Alpha Olefins vzw, established in Brussels,

represented initially by E. Vermulst, advocaat, and subsequently by P. Kugel, advocaat,

interveners,

THE COURT (Third Chamber),

composed of A. Prechal (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, K. Lenaerts, President of the Court, acting as Judge of the Third Chamber, N. Wahl, F. Biltgen and L.S. Rossi, Judges,

Advocate General: E. Tanchev,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

after hearing the Advocate General,

makes the following

Order

1

On 21 January 2021, the Court (Third Chamber) delivered judgment in Germany v Esso Raffinage (C‑471/18 P, EU:C:2021:48).

2

That judgment contains, in the version in the language of the case, an error which it is appropriate to rectify at the request of European Coalition to End Animal Experiments pursuant to Article 154(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, which applies to the procedure on appeal under Article 190(1) of those rules.
 

On those grounds, the Court (Third Chamber) hereby orders:
 

1.

In the introductory part of the judgment of 21 January 2021, Germany v Esso Raffinage (C‑471/18 P, EU:C:2021:48), the reference to European Coalition to End Animal Experiments shall be rectified as follows:

–

‘European Coalition to End Animal Experiments, established in London (United Kingdom), represented by D. Thomas, Solicitor,’

 

2.

The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified judgment.

 

Luxembourg, 4 March 2021.

A. Calot Escobar

Registrar

A. Prechal

President of the Third Chamber

( *1 ) Language of the case: English.

Top