This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 61994TJ0330
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber, extended composition) of 22 October 1996. # Salt Union Ltd v Commission of the European Communities. # State aid - Refusal of the Commission to propose 'appropriate measures' pursuant to Article 93(1) of the Treaty - Action for annulment - Inadmissible. # Case T-330/94.
Az Elsőfokú Bíróság (kibővített harmadik tanács) október 22.-i ítélete: 1996.
Salt Union Ltd kontra az Európai Közösségek Bizottsága.
Állami támogatások - Megsemmisítés iránti kereset - Elfogadhatatlanság.
T-330/94. sz. ügy
Az Elsőfokú Bíróság (kibővített harmadik tanács) október 22.-i ítélete: 1996.
Salt Union Ltd kontra az Európai Közösségek Bizottsága.
Állami támogatások - Megsemmisítés iránti kereset - Elfogadhatatlanság.
T-330/94. sz. ügy
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:1996:154
«(State aid – Refusal of the Commission to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 93(1) of the Treaty – Action for annulment – Inadmissible)»
|
||||
(EC Treaty, Arts 93(1) and 173)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber, Extended Composition)
22 October 1996 (1)
((State aid – Refusal of the Commission to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 93(1) of the Treaty – Action for annulment – Inadmissible))
In Case T-330/94, Salt Union Ltd, a company established under English law in Cheshire (United Kingdom), represented by Jonathan Scott and Craig Pouncey, Solicitors, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Georges Baden, 8 Boulevard Royal,applicant,
supported by Verein Deutsche Salzindustrie eV, an association governed by German law, established in Bonn (Germany), represented by Thomas Jestaedt, Rechtsanwalt, Düsseldorf, and Walter Klosterfelde and Karsten Metzlaff, Rechtsanwälte, Hamburg, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Philippe Dupont, 8-10 Rue Mathias Hardt,intervener,
v
Commission of the European Communities, represented initially by Nicholas Khan and Jean-Paul Keppenne, then by Nicholas Khan and Paul Nemitz, of its Legal Service, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Carlos Gómez de la Cruz, of its Legal Service, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg,defendant,
supported by Frima BV, a company governed by Netherlands law, established in The Hague (Netherlands), represented initially by Tom Ottervanger, of the Rotterdam Bar, and Harold Nyssens, of the Brussels Bar, and then by Tom Ottervanger only, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Carlos Zeyen, 67 Rue Ermesinde,intervener,
APPLICATION for annulment of the decision contained in a letter of 5 August 1994 in which the Commission stated that it had found no reason to propose appropriate measures pursuant to Article 93(1) of the EC Treaty with regard to the Netherlands regional aid scheme Subsidieregeling regionale investeringsprojecten 1991,THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Third Chamber, Extended Composition),
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 2 July 1996,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber, Extended Composition)
hereby:
Briët |
Vesterdorf |
Lindh |
Potocki |
Cooke |
|
H. Jung |
C.P. Briët |
Registrar |
President |