Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 61993TJ0015

    Az ítélet összefoglalása

    Keywords
    Summary

    Keywords

    ++++

    1. Officials ° Reimbursement of expenses ° Daily subsistence allowance ° Purpose ° Probationary official who has previously been a member of the auxiliary staff and of the temporary staff ° Limitation of period of payment ° Not permissible

    (Staff Regulations, Annex VII, Art. 10; Conditions of Employment of Other Servants)

    2. Officials ° Actions ° Unlimited jurisdiction ° Claim for payment ° Admissible

    (Staff Regulations, Art. 91)

    3. Officials ° Actions ° Prior administrative complaint ° Claim for default interest made for the first time before the Court of First Instance in the event of annulment of the contested decision ° Admissible

    (Staff Regulations, Arts 90 and 91)

    Summary

    1. The daily subsistence allowance provided for in Article 10(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations, to which a newly recruited official is entitled before moving to reside at his place of employment, is intended to compensate for the expenses and inconvenience occasioned by the need for an official to move and to establish a provisional residence at his place of employment while maintaining, also on a provisional basis, his previous residence.

    No provision of the Staff Regulations or of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants lays down restrictive rules applicable to an official who is appointed a probationary official after having been a member of the auxiliary staff and then of the temporary staff, and no such restriction is necessary. In such circumstances, where the employment relationship has been precarious at all times, the daily subsistence allowance is granted for a specific purpose, namely to encourage the person concerned to refrain from transferring his residence, a move which, in the event of his not being established, would be premature and would, in the event of termination of his service, give rise to a double reimbursement of removal expenses. The person concerned must therefore be entitled, in return, to the grant of the daily subsistence allowance until the end of the period of precarious employment, plus one month, regardless of whether he has already received that allowance in earlier periods when his employment relationship was also precarious.

    2. In an action of a financial character brought under Article 91 of the Staff Regulations, the Community judicature has unlimited jurisdiction, so that a claim for an order requiring payment of compensation is admissible.

    3. In proceedings by officials, a claim for default interest in the event of annulment of the contested decision need not, in order to be admissible before the Court of First Instance, have been expressly mentioned in the prior administrative complaint.

    Top