This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001CJ0265
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 January 2003. # Criminal proceedings against Annie Pansard and Others, joined as party: Comité Région pêches maritimes. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal de grande instance de Dinan - France. # Origin of a fishery product - Article 28 EC - National legislation imposing a periodic prohibition on the landing of certain fish catches - Competence of the Member States. # Case C-265/01.
A Bíróság (hatodik tanács) 2003. január 16-i ítélete.
Annie Pansard és társai elleni büntetőeljárás.
Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem: Tribunal de grande instance de Dinan - Franciaország.
EK 28. cikk.
C-265/01. sz. ügy
A Bíróság (hatodik tanács) 2003. január 16-i ítélete.
Annie Pansard és társai elleni büntetőeljárás.
Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem: Tribunal de grande instance de Dinan - Franciaország.
EK 28. cikk.
C-265/01. sz. ügy
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:28
*A9* Tribunal de grande instance de Dinan, jugement du 28/06/2001 (263/2001)
«(Origin of a fishery product – Article 28 EC – National legislation imposing a periodic prohibition on the landing of certain fish catches – Competence of the Member States)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Council Regulations Nos 3760/92, Art. 10(1), and 850/98, Art. 46(1))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber)
16 January 2003 (1)
((Origin of a fishery product – Article 28 EC – National legislation imposing a periodic prohibition on the landing of certain fish catches – Competence of the Member States))
In Case C-265/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC from the Tribunal de grande instance de Dinan (France), for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings pending before that court against Annie Pansard and Others, joined as party: Comité Région pêches maritimes, civil party in those proceedings, on the interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) and of Article 28 EC,THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of the French Government, represented by L. Bernheim, the Netherlands Government, represented by J. van Bakel, acting as Agent, and the Commission, represented by A. Bordes and T. van Rijn, at the hearing on 21 March 2002,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 23 April 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
in answer to the questions referred to it by the Tribunal de grande instance de Dinan by judgment of 28 June 2001, hereby rules:
Puissochet |
Gulmann |
Macken |
Colneric |
Cunha Rodrigues |
|
R. Grass |
J.-P. Puissochet |
Registrar |
President of the Sixth Chamber |