This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/297/41
Case C-447/07: Action brought on 1 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic
Case C-447/07: Action brought on 1 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic
Case C-447/07: Action brought on 1 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic
SL C 297, 8.12.2007, p. 25–26
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.12.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 297/25 |
Action brought on 1 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic
(Case C-447/07)
(2007/C 297/41)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and L. Pignataro-Nolin, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Italian Republic
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
declare that, by laying down in its legislation that Italian citizenship is required for the posts of master or first officer (second-in-command) on all vessels flying the Italian flag, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 39 EC; |
|
— |
order the Italian Republic to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The Commission claims that the Italian legislation laying down that Italian citizenship is required for the posts of master or second-in-command on all vessels flying the Italian flag does not comply with Article 39 EC, which enshrines the principle of freedom of movement for workers, as interpreted by the Court.
In two cases concerning, respectively, the posts of master and second-in-command of merchant ships flying the Spanish flag (Case C-405/01) and the post of master of vessels engaged in small-scale maritime shipping (‘Kleine Seeschifffahrt’), and in the specific case of German-flagged fishing vessels carrying on small-scale maritime fishing (Case C-47/02), the Court made clear, in its judgments of 30 September 2003, the proper interpretation of Article 39 EC.
The Commission observes that, in the course of the present procedure, the Italian authorities have not put forward any arguments which differ from those put forward at the time in Case C-405/01 (in which the Italian Republic intervened) or those which the French authorities supported in Case C-47/02. Those arguments were rejected by the Court in its judgments of 30 September 2003.
The Commission confines itself to pointing out that the Italian authorities, in their reply to the reasoned opinion of 22 May 2007, do not deny the infringement. They actually stated their intention of repealing the requirement of Italian citizenship for appointment to the post of master or first officer (second-in-command), undertaking to inform the Commission of the outcome of the consultations between the Ministries concerned.
The Commission has received no information on the timetable for the amendment of the Italian legislation. Consequently, it submits that the Italian legislation laying down that Italian citizenship is required for the posts of master or second-in-command on all vessels flying the Italian flag does not comply with Article 39 EC, which enshrines the principle of freedom of movement for workers, as interpreted by the Court.