EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/170/39
Case T-433/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 June 2007 — Davi v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2003 Promotion procedure — Decision not to promote — Award of promotion points — Consideration of the comparative merits — Equal treatment — General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Plea of illegality — Legitimate expectations)
Case T-433/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 June 2007 — Davi v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2003 Promotion procedure — Decision not to promote — Award of promotion points — Consideration of the comparative merits — Equal treatment — General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Plea of illegality — Legitimate expectations)
Case T-433/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 June 2007 — Davi v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2003 Promotion procedure — Decision not to promote — Award of promotion points — Consideration of the comparative merits — Equal treatment — General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Plea of illegality — Legitimate expectations)
SL C 170, 21.7.2007, p. 21–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.7.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 170/21 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 June 2007 — Davi v Commission
(Case T-433/04) (1)
(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2003 Promotion procedure - Decision not to promote - Award of promotion points - Consideration of the comparative merits - Equal treatment - General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Plea of illegality - Legitimate expectations)
(2007/C 170/39)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Angela Davi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall, initially, and subsequently by C. Berardis-Kayser and M. Velardo, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment, first, of the Appointing Authority's decision of 2 July 2004 rejecting the applicant's complaint against that authority's decision not to promote her to Grade C2 for the 2003 promotion procedure and, secondly, in so far as necessary, of the original decision which was the subject of that complaint.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |