Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2007/129/33

    Case T-105/07: Action brought on 2 April 2007 — MarketTools v OHIM — Optimus-Telecomunicações (ZOOMERANG)

    SL C 129, 9.6.2007, p. 19–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    9.6.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 129/19

    Action brought on 2 April 2007 — MarketTools v OHIM — Optimus-Telecomunicações (ZOOMERANG)

    (Case T-105/07)

    (2007/C 129/33)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: MarketTools, Inc. (San Francisco, United-States) (represented by: W. von der Osten-Sacken and A. González Hähnlein, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Optimus-Telecomunicações, SA (Maia, Portugal)

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 25 January 2007 (Appeal No R 253/2006-2);

    —

    order Optimus-Telecomunicações S.A. to bear the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ZOOMERANG ’for goods and services in classes 9, 35 and 42 — application No 1 603 950

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Optimus-Telecomunicações, SA

    Mark or sign cited: The national word and figurative marks ‘BOOMERANG ’for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 37, 38 and 42

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in its entirety

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal did not correctly assess the similarity of the goods and services and the trade marks in question.

    Top