This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/095/75
Case T-110/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 March 2007 — Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission (Officials — Career development report — Assessment period 2001/2002 — Action for annulment — Statement of reasons — Evaluation of merits — Evidence — Action for damages)
Case T-110/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 March 2007 — Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission (Officials — Career development report — Assessment period 2001/2002 — Action for annulment — Statement of reasons — Evaluation of merits — Evidence — Action for damages)
Case T-110/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 March 2007 — Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission (Officials — Career development report — Assessment period 2001/2002 — Action for annulment — Statement of reasons — Evaluation of merits — Evidence — Action for damages)
SL C 95, 28.4.2007, p. 38–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
28.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 95/38 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 March 2007 — Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission
(Case T-110/04) (1)
(Officials - Career development report - Assessment period 2001/2002 - Action for annulment - Statement of reasons - Evaluation of merits - Evidence - Action for damages)
(2007/C 95/75)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Paulo Sequeira Wandschneider (Brussels, Belgium) (originally represented by G. Vandersanden and A. Finchelstein, and then by G. Vandersanden and C. Ronzi, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)
Re:
First, an application for annulment of the decision of 23 April 2003 containing the applicant's career development report for the period 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002 and, second, an application for damages
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Annuls the decision of 23 April 2003 containing the applicant's career development report for the period 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002; |
2. |
Rejects the action for damages; |
3. |
Orders the Commission to pay all the costs. |