This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/082/115
Case F-84/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2007 — Neirinck v Commission (Officials — Temporary staff — Admissibility — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Alleged promise to recruit)
Case F-84/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2007 — Neirinck v Commission (Officials — Temporary staff — Admissibility — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Alleged promise to recruit)
Case F-84/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2007 — Neirinck v Commission (Officials — Temporary staff — Admissibility — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Alleged promise to recruit)
SL C 82, 14.4.2007, p. 55–55
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
14.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 82/55 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2007 — Neirinck v Commission
(Case F-84/05) (1)
(Officials - Temporary staff - Admissibility - Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Alleged promise to recruit)
(2007/C 82/115)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Wineke Neirinck (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: G. Vandersanden, L. Levi and C. Ronzi, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and L. Lozano Palacios, agents)
Re:
An application for damages seeking compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant as a result of not having been employed as a member of the temporary staff following an alleged error on the part of the defendant's administration.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
dismisses the action; |
2. |
orders each party to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 281, 12.11.2005, p. 29 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-334/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).