This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/331/16
Case C-238/05: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain)) — Asnef-Equifax, Servicios de Información sobre Solvencia y Crédito, SL v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc) (Competition — Article 81 EC — System for the exchange between financial institutions of information on customer solvency — Reference for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Effect on trade between Member States — Restriction of competition — Benefit for consumers)
Case C-238/05: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain)) — Asnef-Equifax, Servicios de Información sobre Solvencia y Crédito, SL v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc) (Competition — Article 81 EC — System for the exchange between financial institutions of information on customer solvency — Reference for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Effect on trade between Member States — Restriction of competition — Benefit for consumers)
Case C-238/05: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain)) — Asnef-Equifax, Servicios de Información sobre Solvencia y Crédito, SL v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc) (Competition — Article 81 EC — System for the exchange between financial institutions of information on customer solvency — Reference for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Effect on trade between Member States — Restriction of competition — Benefit for consumers)
SL C 331, 30.12.2006, p. 10–10
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
30.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 331/10 |
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain)) — Asnef-Equifax, Servicios de Información sobre Solvencia y Crédito, SL v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc)
(Case C-238/05) (1)
(Competition - Article 81 EC - System for the exchange between financial institutions of information on customer solvency - Reference for a preliminary ruling - Admissibility - Effect on trade between Member States - Restriction of competition - Benefit for consumers)
(2006/C 331/16)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Tribunal Supremo
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: ASNEF-EQUIFAX, Servicios de Información sobre Solvencia y Crédito, SL
Defendant: Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc)
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Supremo — Interpretation of Article 81 EC — Compatibility with the common market of an agreement setting up a system for the exchange between financial institutions of information on customer solvency — Beneficial effects for consumers and users of financial services — Possibility of Member States granting an exemption
Operative part of the judgment
|
1) |
Article 81(1) EC must be interpreted as meaning that a system for the exchange of information on credit between financial institutions, such as the register of information on customer solvency at issue in the main proceedings, does not, in principle, have as its effect the restriction of competition within the meaning of that provision, provided that the relevant market or markets are not highly concentrated, that that system does not permit lenders to be identified and that the conditions of access and use by financial institutions are not discriminatory, in law or in fact. |
|
2) |
In the event that a system for the exchange of information on credit, such as that register, restricts competition within the meaning of Article 81(1) EC, the applicability of the exemption provided for in Article 81(3) EC is subject to the four cumulative conditions laid down in that provision. It is for the national court to determine whether those conditions are satisfied. In order for the condition that consumers be allowed a fair share of the benefit to be satisfied, it is not necessary, in principle, for each consumer individually to derive a benefit from an agreement, a decision or a concerted practice. However, the overall effect on consumers in the relevant markets must be favourable. |